JPTC.L vs. GBDV.L
JPTC.L (JPMorgan Carbon Transition Global Equity UCITS ETF USD (acc)) and GBDV.L (SPDR S&P Global Dividend Aristocrats UCITS) are both Global Equities funds - JPTC.L tracks the MSCI ACWI NR USD while GBDV.L tracks the S&P Global Dividend Aristocrats index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, JPTC.L returned 11.69%/yr vs 7.43%/yr for GBDV.L. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. JPTC.L charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for GBDV.L.
Performance
JPTC.L vs. GBDV.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
JPTC.L is traded in GBp, while GBDV.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the GBDV.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with JPTC.L having a 6.75% return and GBDV.L slightly higher at 7.03%.
JPTC.L
- 1D
- 0.45%
- 1M
- 4.58%
- YTD
- 6.75%
- 6M
- 6.98%
- 1Y
- 21.63%
- 3Y*
- 15.41%
- 5Y*
- 11.69%
- 10Y*
- —
GBDV.L
- 1D
- 0.56%
- 1M
- 0.73%
- YTD
- 7.03%
- 6M
- 7.39%
- 1Y
- 19.22%
- 3Y*
- 12.48%
- 5Y*
- 7.43%
- 10Y*
- 7.98%
JPTC.L vs. GBDV.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JPTC.L JPMorgan Carbon Transition Global Equity UCITS ETF USD (acc) | 6.75% | 11.44% | 20.36% | 16.17% | -8.74% | 25.32% | 0.92% |
GBDV.L SPDR S&P Global Dividend Aristocrats UCITS | 7.03% | 10.06% | 9.77% | 1.90% | 5.38% | 17.41% | 1.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between JPTC.L and GBDV.L is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2020 | 0.41 |
JPTC.L vs. GBDV.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
JPTC.L
GBDV.L
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Communication Services
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Utilities
Energy
Real Estate
Technology
JPTC.L
GBDV.L
Financial Services
JPTC.L
GBDV.L
Consumer Cyclical
JPTC.L
GBDV.L
Industrials
JPTC.L
GBDV.L
Communication Services
JPTC.L
GBDV.L
Healthcare
JPTC.L
GBDV.L
Consumer Defensive
JPTC.L
GBDV.L
Basic Materials
JPTC.L
GBDV.L
Utilities
JPTC.L
GBDV.L
Energy
JPTC.L
GBDV.L
Real Estate
JPTC.L
GBDV.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JPTC.L vs. GBDV.L — Risk / Return Rank
JPTC.L
GBDV.L
JPTC.L vs. GBDV.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Carbon Transition Global Equity UCITS ETF USD (acc) (JPTC.L) and SPDR S&P Global Dividend Aristocrats UCITS (GBDV.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JPTC.L | GBDV.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.39 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.48 | 3.17 | -0.69 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.17 | 9.91 | +0.26 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JPTC.L | GBDV.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.95 | 2.17 | -0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.01 | 0.63 | +0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.57 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.12 | 0.65 | +0.47 |
Drawdowns
JPTC.L vs. GBDV.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JPTC.L drawdown since its inception was -19.17%, smaller than the maximum GBDV.L drawdown of -34.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JPTC.L and GBDV.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JPTC.L | GBDV.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.17% | -34.77% | +15.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.69% | -6.04% | -2.65% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.17% | -13.42% | -5.75% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.17% | -15.84% | -3.33% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.77% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.01% | -1.64% | +1.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.84% | -5.16% | +2.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.12% | 1.93% | +0.19% |
Volatility
JPTC.L vs. GBDV.L - Volatility Comparison
JPMorgan Carbon Transition Global Equity UCITS ETF USD (acc) (JPTC.L) has a higher volatility of 2.56% compared to SPDR S&P Global Dividend Aristocrats UCITS (GBDV.L) at 2.26%. This indicates that JPTC.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GBDV.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JPTC.L | GBDV.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.56% | 2.26% | +0.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.25% | 6.52% | +1.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.04% | 8.81% | +2.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.19% | 11.74% | +3.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.23% | 14.13% | +1.10% |
JPTC.L vs. GBDV.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
JPTC.L has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than GBDV.L's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
JPTC.L vs. GBDV.L - Dividend Comparison
JPTC.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GBDV.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.50%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GBDV.L SPDR S&P Global Dividend Aristocrats UCITS | 4.50% | 4.91% | 4.49% | 4.87% | 5.05% | 4.26% | 4.41% | 4.41% | 5.18% | 4.26% | 4.74% | 5.72% |
JPTC.L JPMorgan Carbon Transition Global Equity UCITS ETF USD (acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JPTC.L and GBDV.L have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, JPTC.L is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
JPTC.L is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for GBDV.L.
JPTC.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD, while GBDV.L tracks S&P Global Dividend Aristocrats index. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for JPTC.L and 0.45% for GBDV.L.
Find the right allocation for JPTC.L and GBDV.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer