JPST vs. PRF
JPST (JPMorgan Ultra-Short Income ETF) and PRF (Invesco RAFI US 1000 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - JPST is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by JPMorgan, while PRF is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the RAFI Fundamental Select US 1000 Index. JPST is actively managed, while PRF is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, JPST returned 3.64%/yr vs 13.06%/yr for PRF. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. JPST charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.34%/yr for PRF.
Performance
JPST vs. PRF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JPST achieves a 1.56% return, which is significantly lower than PRF's 16.44% return.
JPST
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- 0.37%
- YTD
- 1.56%
- 6M
- 1.76%
- 1Y
- 4.34%
- 3Y*
- 5.19%
- 5Y*
- 3.64%
- 10Y*
- —
PRF
- 1D
- 0.68%
- 1M
- 4.19%
- YTD
- 16.44%
- 6M
- 16.00%
- 1Y
- 34.32%
- 3Y*
- 20.74%
- 5Y*
- 13.06%
- 10Y*
- 13.94%
JPST vs. PRF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JPST JPMorgan Ultra-Short Income ETF | 1.56% | 4.99% | 5.58% | 5.13% | 1.14% | 0.11% | 2.18% | 3.34% | 2.23% | 0.98% |
PRF Invesco RAFI US 1000 ETF | 16.44% | 18.33% | 16.73% | 15.72% | -7.79% | 31.12% | 7.78% | 27.42% | -8.71% | 14.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between JPST and PRF is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 19, 2017 | 0.05 |
Over the past year, JPST and PRF have become more correlated (0.26) than their long-term average of 0.05, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JPST vs. PRF — Risk / Return Rank
JPST
PRF
JPST vs. PRF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Ultra-Short Income ETF (JPST) and Invesco RAFI US 1000 ETF (PRF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| JPST | PRF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +5.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +13.65 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 4.00 | 1.58 | +2.42 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 29.30 | 5.23 | +24.07 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 143.82 | 21.40 | +122.42 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
JPST vs. PRF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JPST drawdown since its inception was -3.28%, smaller than the maximum PRF drawdown of -60.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JPST and PRF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JPST | PRF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.28% | -60.35% | +57.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.15% | -6.59% | +6.44% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.30% | -15.82% | +15.52% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -0.79% | -19.72% | +18.93% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -38.16% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.08% | -6.92% | +6.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.03% | 1.61% | -1.58% |
Volatility
JPST vs. PRF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for JPMorgan Ultra-Short Income ETF (JPST) is 0.16%, while Invesco RAFI US 1000 ETF (PRF) has a volatility of 3.64%. This indicates that JPST experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PRF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JPST | PRF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.16% | 3.64% | -3.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.36% | 8.18% | -7.82% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.53% | 10.93% | -10.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.58% | 15.24% | -14.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.93% | 17.69% | -16.76% |
JPST vs. PRF - Expense Ratio Comparison
JPST has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than PRF's 0.34% expense ratio.
Dividends
JPST vs. PRF - Dividend Comparison
JPST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.25%, more than PRF's 1.36% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JPST JPMorgan Ultra-Short Income ETF | 4.25% | 4.43% | 5.16% | 4.79% | 1.83% | 0.73% | 1.43% | 2.69% | 2.07% | 0.96% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PRF Invesco RAFI US 1000 ETF | 1.36% | 1.59% | 1.78% | 1.84% | 2.01% | 1.58% | 1.97% | 1.99% | 2.25% | 1.58% | 2.17% | 2.25% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JPST and PRF have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PRF has higher volatility (3.64%) compared to JPST (0.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JPST dropped -3.28% vs PRF's -60.35%.
On 5-year performance, PRF leads with 13.06% vs 3.64% for JPST. On fees, JPST is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, JPST has been the lower-risk option at 0.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, PRF has performed better with a 13.06% return vs 3.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
JPST is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.34% for PRF.
JPST has the higher dividend yield at 4.25%, compared with 1.36% for PRF.
JPST is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while PRF is Large Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for JPST and 0.34% for PRF.
JPST currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (8.18 vs 3.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JPST and PRF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer