JPSR.L vs. UC15.L
JPSR.L (UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Japan Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (JPY) A-dis) and UC15.L (UBS ETF (IE) CMCI Composite SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc) are both exchange-traded funds - JPSR.L is a Japan Equities fund tracking the TOPIX TR JPY, while UC15.L is a Commodities fund tracking the UBS CMCI. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, JPSR.L returned 8.71%/yr vs 9.68%/yr for UC15.L. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. JPSR.L charges 0.22%/yr vs 0.34%/yr for UC15.L.
Performance
JPSR.L vs. UC15.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JPSR.L achieves a 11.27% return, which is significantly lower than UC15.L's 21.49% return. Over the past 10 years, JPSR.L has underperformed UC15.L with an annualized return of 8.71%, while UC15.L has yielded a comparatively higher 9.68% annualized return.
JPSR.L
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- 8.14%
- YTD
- 11.27%
- 6M
- 11.47%
- 1Y
- 28.02%
- 3Y*
- 12.10%
- 5Y*
- 7.46%
- 10Y*
- 8.71%
UC15.L
- 1D
- -1.31%
- 1M
- -0.91%
- YTD
- 21.49%
- 6M
- 22.05%
- 1Y
- 32.45%
- 3Y*
- 10.32%
- 5Y*
- 12.77%
- 10Y*
- 9.68%
JPSR.L vs. UC15.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JPSR.L UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Japan Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (JPY) A-dis | 11.27% | 18.27% | 8.64% | 7.70% | -9.85% | -3.37% | 16.62% | 21.49% | -11.09% | 10.04% |
UC15.L UBS ETF (IE) CMCI Composite SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc | 21.49% | 2.57% | 6.44% | -6.52% | 29.97% | 36.11% | -2.49% | 5.31% | -5.25% | -2.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between JPSR.L and UC15.L is -0.16, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.16 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.00 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2015 | 0.18 |
The correlation between JPSR.L and UC15.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.16 (1 year) to 0.18 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
JPSR.L vs. UC15.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
JPSR.L
UC15.L
Technology
Industrials
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Real Estate
-
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Technology
JPSR.L
UC15.L
Industrials
JPSR.L
UC15.L
Financial Services
JPSR.L
UC15.L
Communication Services
JPSR.L
UC15.L
Consumer Cyclical
JPSR.L
UC15.L
Healthcare
JPSR.L
UC15.L
Real Estate
JPSR.L
UC15.L
-
Consumer Defensive
JPSR.L
UC15.L
Basic Materials
JPSR.L
UC15.L
Energy
JPSR.L
-
UC15.L
Utilities
JPSR.L
-
UC15.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JPSR.L vs. UC15.L — Risk / Return Rank
JPSR.L
UC15.L
JPSR.L vs. UC15.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Japan Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (JPY) A-dis (JPSR.L) and UBS ETF (IE) CMCI Composite SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (UC15.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JPSR.L | UC15.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.54 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.54 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.39 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.61 | 5.23 | -2.62 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.53 | 13.93 | -5.40 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JPSR.L | UC15.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.58 | 2.12 | -0.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 | 0.87 | -0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 | 0.66 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.63 | 0.33 | +0.29 |
Drawdowns
JPSR.L vs. UC15.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JPSR.L drawdown since its inception was -23.05%, smaller than the maximum UC15.L drawdown of -42.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JPSR.L and UC15.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JPSR.L | UC15.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.05% | -42.93% | +19.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.84% | -6.18% | -4.66% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.83% | -13.98% | +0.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.57% | -17.43% | -4.14% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -23.05% | -30.26% | +7.21% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.22% | -3.53% | +3.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.89% | -15.17% | +8.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.31% | 2.32% | +0.99% |
Volatility
JPSR.L vs. UC15.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Japan Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (JPY) A-dis (JPSR.L) is 3.74%, while UBS ETF (IE) CMCI Composite SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (UC15.L) has a volatility of 5.07%. This indicates that JPSR.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UC15.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JPSR.L | UC15.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.74% | 5.07% | -1.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.41% | 12.34% | +2.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.92% | 15.26% | +2.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.72% | 14.69% | +1.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.70% | 14.80% | +2.90% |
JPSR.L vs. UC15.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
JPSR.L has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is lower than UC15.L's 0.34% expense ratio.
Dividends
JPSR.L vs. UC15.L - Dividend Comparison
JPSR.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, while UC15.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JPSR.L UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Japan Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (JPY) A-dis | 1.03% | 1.74% | 1.67% | 1.60% | 1.71% | 1.36% | 1.36% | 1.51% | 1.58% | 1.42% | 1.16% |
UC15.L UBS ETF (IE) CMCI Composite SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JPSR.L and UC15.L have a correlation of -0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, JPSR.L is cheaper at 0.22% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
JPSR.L is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.34% for UC15.L.
JPSR.L is categorized as Japan Equities, while UC15.L is Commodities. JPSR.L tracks TOPIX TR JPY, while UC15.L tracks UBS CMCI. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for JPSR.L and 0.34% for UC15.L.
Find the right allocation for JPSR.L and UC15.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer