JPSE vs. FSGS
JPSE (JPMorgan Diversified Return U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF) and FSGS (First Trust SMID Growth Strength ETF) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds - JPSE tracks the JPMorgan Diversified Factor US Small Cap Equity Index while FSGS tracks the SMID Growth Strength Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, JPSE returned 7.07%/yr vs 2.19%/yr for FSGS. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. JPSE charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for FSGS.
Performance
JPSE vs. FSGS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JPSE achieves a 15.46% return, which is significantly higher than FSGS's 1.27% return.
JPSE
- 1D
- -1.03%
- 1M
- 0.95%
- YTD
- 15.46%
- 6M
- 14.54%
- 1Y
- 31.79%
- 3Y*
- 15.24%
- 5Y*
- 7.07%
- 10Y*
- —
FSGS
- 1D
- -0.37%
- 1M
- 0.83%
- YTD
- 1.27%
- 6M
- 0.20%
- 1Y
- 4.81%
- 3Y*
- 7.06%
- 5Y*
- 2.19%
- 10Y*
- —
JPSE vs. FSGS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JPSE JPMorgan Diversified Return U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF | 15.46% | 8.77% | 8.07% | 15.87% | -14.40% | 29.31% | 12.49% | 22.95% | -8.61% | 10.41% |
FSGS First Trust SMID Growth Strength ETF | 1.27% | 2.41% | 6.38% | 15.98% | -13.17% | 25.56% | 10.26% | 21.31% | -11.92% | 10.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between JPSE and FSGS is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2017 | 0.86 |
The correlation between JPSE and FSGS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.
JPSE vs. FSGS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
JPSE
FSGS
Technology
Real Estate
Industrials
Financial Services
Basic Materials
Healthcare
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Utilities
-
Communication Services
Technology
JPSE
FSGS
Real Estate
JPSE
FSGS
Industrials
JPSE
FSGS
Financial Services
JPSE
FSGS
Basic Materials
JPSE
FSGS
Healthcare
JPSE
FSGS
Energy
JPSE
FSGS
Consumer Defensive
JPSE
FSGS
Consumer Cyclical
JPSE
FSGS
Utilities
JPSE
FSGS
-
Communication Services
JPSE
FSGS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JPSE vs. FSGS — Risk / Return Rank
JPSE
FSGS
JPSE vs. FSGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Diversified Return U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF (JPSE) and First Trust SMID Growth Strength ETF (FSGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JPSE | FSGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.68 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.32 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.06 | +0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.99 | 0.43 | +3.56 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.20 | 1.21 | +12.98 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JPSE | FSGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.00 | 0.32 | +1.68 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.35 | 0.11 | +0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.49 | 0.30 | +0.18 |
Drawdowns
JPSE vs. FSGS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JPSE drawdown since its inception was -43.02%, roughly equal to the maximum FSGS drawdown of -43.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JPSE and FSGS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JPSE | FSGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.02% | -43.26% | +0.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.00% | -11.31% | +3.31% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.49% | -24.08% | -1.41% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.56% | -24.08% | -1.48% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.37% | -4.73% | +3.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.42% | -8.03% | +0.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.24% | 3.97% | -1.73% |
Volatility
JPSE vs. FSGS - Volatility Comparison
JPMorgan Diversified Return U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF (JPSE) has a higher volatility of 4.52% compared to First Trust SMID Growth Strength ETF (FSGS) at 3.74%. This indicates that JPSE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JPSE | FSGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.52% | 3.74% | +0.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.90% | 10.73% | +0.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.00% | 15.24% | +0.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.08% | 20.14% | -0.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.82% | 22.81% | -0.99% |
JPSE vs. FSGS - Expense Ratio Comparison
JPSE has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than FSGS's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
JPSE vs. FSGS - Dividend Comparison
JPSE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.38%, while FSGS has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSGS First Trust SMID Growth Strength ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.71% | 2.29% | 1.95% | 1.35% | 1.32% | 1.77% | 2.13% | 1.15% | 0.00% |
JPSE JPMorgan Diversified Return U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF | 1.38% | 1.62% | 1.66% | 1.76% | 1.55% | 1.24% | 1.32% | 1.23% | 1.18% | 0.74% | 0.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JPSE and FSGS have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
JPSE has higher volatility (4.52%) compared to FSGS (3.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JPSE dropped -43.02% vs FSGS's -43.26%.
On 5-year performance, JPSE leads with 7.07% vs 2.19% for FSGS. On fees, JPSE is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, FSGS has been the lower-risk option at 3.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, JPSE has performed better with a 7.07% return vs 2.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
JPSE is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for FSGS.
JPSE has the higher dividend yield at 1.38%, compared with 0.00% for FSGS.
JPSE tracks JPMorgan Diversified Factor US Small Cap Equity Index, while FSGS tracks SMID Growth Strength Index. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for JPSE and 0.60% for FSGS.
JPSE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.00 vs 0.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JPSE and FSGS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer