PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JPSA.L vs. JPLG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JPSA.L vs. JPLG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan USD Ultra-Short Income Active UCITS ETF USD Acc (JPSA.L) and JPMorgan Global Equity Multi-Factor UCITS ETF Accumulating (JPLG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

JPSA.L is traded in USD, while JPLG.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the JPLG.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JPSA.L achieves a 1.40% return, which is significantly lower than JPLG.L's 10.50% return.


JPSA.L

1D
0.01%
1M
0.25%
YTD
1.40%
6M
1.71%
1Y
4.50%
3Y*
5.11%
5Y*
3.58%
10Y*

JPLG.L

1D
0.41%
1M
2.46%
YTD
10.50%
6M
12.13%
1Y
22.26%
3Y*
16.83%
5Y*
9.24%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JPSA.L vs. JPLG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
JPSA.L
JPMorgan USD Ultra-Short Income Active UCITS ETF USD Acc
1.40%5.07%5.55%5.05%1.05%0.08%2.32%1.29%
JPLG.L
JPMorgan Global Equity Multi-Factor UCITS ETF Accumulating
10.50%18.42%10.23%12.69%-10.05%23.54%5.71%6.20%

Correlation

The correlation between JPSA.L and JPLG.L is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.16

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.13

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 17, 2019

0.07

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JPSA.L vs. JPLG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JPSA.L
JPSA.L Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
JPSA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JPSA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
JPSA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
JPSA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
JPSA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

JPLG.L
JPLG.L Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
JPLG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JPLG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
JPLG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
JPLG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
JPLG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JPSA.L vs. JPLG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan USD Ultra-Short Income Active UCITS ETF USD Acc (JPSA.L) and JPMorgan Global Equity Multi-Factor UCITS ETF Accumulating (JPLG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JPSA.LJPLG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+4.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+9.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

2.80

1.42

+1.38

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

21.41

3.36

+18.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

107.48

12.57

+94.91

JPSA.L vs. JPLG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JPSA.L Sharpe Ratio is 6.56, which is higher than the JPLG.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JPSA.L and JPLG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JPSA.LJPLG.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.56

2.42

+4.14

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

5.69

0.70

+4.99

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

3.98

0.68

+3.29

Drawdowns

JPSA.L vs. JPLG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JPSA.L drawdown since its inception was -2.92%, smaller than the maximum JPLG.L drawdown of -35.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JPSA.L and JPLG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JPSA.LJPLG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.92%

-35.38%

+32.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.21%

-6.61%

+6.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.39%

-12.54%

+12.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-0.86%

-21.57%

+20.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.11%

-4.51%

+4.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.04%

1.77%

-1.73%

Volatility

JPSA.L vs. JPLG.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JPMorgan USD Ultra-Short Income Active UCITS ETF USD Acc (JPSA.L) is 0.22%, while JPMorgan Global Equity Multi-Factor UCITS ETF Accumulating (JPLG.L) has a volatility of 2.36%. This indicates that JPSA.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JPLG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JPSA.LJPLG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.22%

2.36%

-2.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.50%

6.92%

-6.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68%

9.17%

-8.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.63%

13.19%

-12.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.80%

15.84%

-15.04%

JPSA.L vs. JPLG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

JPSA.L has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than JPLG.L's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

JPSA.L vs. JPLG.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither JPSA.L nor JPLG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


JPSA.L and JPLG.L have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, JPSA.L is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

JPSA.L is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for JPLG.L.

JPSA.L is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while JPLG.L is Global Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for JPSA.L and 0.20% for JPLG.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JPSA.L and JPLG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer