PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JPSA.L vs. BB3M.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JPSA.L vs. BB3M.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan USD Ultra-Short Income Active UCITS ETF USD Acc (JPSA.L) and JPM BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond 0-3 Months UCITS ETF USD Acc USD (BB3M.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JPSA.L achieves a 1.40% return, which is significantly lower than BB3M.L's 1.48% return.


JPSA.L

1D
0.00%
1M
0.27%
YTD
1.40%
6M
1.70%
1Y
4.42%
3Y*
5.13%
5Y*
3.59%
10Y*

BB3M.L

1D
0.05%
1M
0.34%
YTD
1.48%
6M
1.88%
1Y
3.95%
3Y*
4.69%
5Y*
3.46%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JPSA.L vs. BB3M.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
JPSA.L
JPMorgan USD Ultra-Short Income Active UCITS ETF USD Acc
1.40%5.07%5.55%5.05%1.05%-0.01%
BB3M.L
JPM BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond 0-3 Months UCITS ETF USD Acc USD
1.48%4.28%5.24%4.94%1.46%-0.02%

Correlation

The correlation between JPSA.L and BB3M.L is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.01

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.07

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2021

0.14

The correlation between JPSA.L and BB3M.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.01 (1 year) to 0.14 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JPSA.L vs. BB3M.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JPSA.L
JPSA.L Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
JPSA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JPSA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
JPSA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
JPSA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
JPSA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

BB3M.L
BB3M.L Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
BB3M.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BB3M.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
BB3M.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
BB3M.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
BB3M.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JPSA.L vs. BB3M.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan USD Ultra-Short Income Active UCITS ETF USD Acc (JPSA.L) and JPM BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond 0-3 Months UCITS ETF USD Acc USD (BB3M.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JPSA.LBB3M.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.67

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

2.77

2.14

+0.62

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

21.05

28.84

-7.78

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

105.71

103.10

+2.61

JPSA.L vs. BB3M.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JPSA.L Sharpe Ratio is 6.47, which is higher than the BB3M.L Sharpe Ratio of 4.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JPSA.L and BB3M.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JPSA.LBB3M.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.47

4.80

+1.67

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

5.69

3.51

+2.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

3.98

3.40

+0.57

Drawdowns

JPSA.L vs. BB3M.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JPSA.L drawdown since its inception was -2.92%, which is greater than BB3M.L's maximum drawdown of -1.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JPSA.L and BB3M.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JPSA.LBB3M.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.92%

-1.19%

-1.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.21%

-0.14%

-0.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.39%

-0.23%

-0.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-0.86%

-1.19%

+0.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.11%

-0.03%

-0.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.04%

0.04%

0.00%

Volatility

JPSA.L vs. BB3M.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JPMorgan USD Ultra-Short Income Active UCITS ETF USD Acc (JPSA.L) is 0.22%, while JPM BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond 0-3 Months UCITS ETF USD Acc USD (BB3M.L) has a volatility of 0.30%. This indicates that JPSA.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BB3M.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JPSA.LBB3M.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.22%

0.30%

-0.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.50%

0.63%

-0.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68%

0.82%

-0.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.63%

0.99%

-0.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.80%

0.96%

-0.16%

JPSA.L vs. BB3M.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

JPSA.L has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than BB3M.L's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

JPSA.L vs. BB3M.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither JPSA.L nor BB3M.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


JPSA.L and BB3M.L have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BB3M.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BB3M.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for JPSA.L.

Their fees differ too: 0.18% for JPSA.L and 0.07% for BB3M.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JPSA.L and BB3M.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer