PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JPO vs. DIVN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JPO vs. DIVN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax JPM Option Income Strategy ETF (JPO) and Horizon Dividend Income ETF (DIVN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JPO achieves a 8.98% return, which is significantly lower than DIVN's 14.80% return.


JPO

1D
0.34%
1M
5.47%
6M
14.60%
YTD
8.98%
1Y
19.08%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
17.53%

DIVN

1D
0.20%
1M
1.14%
6M
8.07%
YTD
14.80%
1Y
22.54%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
21.81%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$10.90M$5.41M$2.61M
$418.56K$404.33K$336.84K

JPO vs. DIVN - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between JPO and DIVN is 0.33, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025

0.32

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JPO vs. DIVN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

JPO
JPO Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
JPO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JPO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
JPO Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
JPO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
JPO Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

DIVN
DIVN Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
DIVN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DIVN Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
DIVN Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
DIVN Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
DIVN Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

JPO vs. DIVN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax JPM Option Income Strategy ETF (JPO) and Horizon Dividend Income ETF (DIVN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JPODIVNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.39

-0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.21

4.08

-2.87

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.00

11.49

-8.49

JPO vs. DIVN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JPO Sharpe Ratio is 0.89, which is lower than the DIVN Sharpe Ratio of 2.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JPO and DIVN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JPO vs. DIVN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JPO drawdown since its inception was -24.80%, which is greater than DIVN's maximum drawdown of -5.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JPO and DIVN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JPODIVNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.80%

-5.55%

-19.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.24%

-5.55%

-8.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.04%

-1.39%

+0.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.42%

-1.35%

-3.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.72%

1.97%

+3.75%

Volatility

JPO vs. DIVN - Volatility Comparison

YieldMax JPM Option Income Strategy ETF (JPO) has a higher volatility of 5.21% compared to Horizon Dividend Income ETF (DIVN) at 3.15%. This indicates that JPO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DIVN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JPODIVNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.21%

3.15%

+2.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.08%

7.55%

+6.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.41%

10.52%

+8.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.06%

10.53%

+8.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.06%

10.53%

+8.53%

JPO vs. DIVN - Expense Ratio Comparison

JPO has a 1.19% expense ratio, which is higher than DIVN's 0.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

JPO vs. DIVN - Dividend Comparison

JPO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 31.81%, more than DIVN's 3.70% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
DIVN
Horizon Dividend Income ETF
3.70%1.47%0.00%0.00%
JPO
YieldMax JPM Option Income Strategy ETF
31.81%34.13%25.15%4.84%

Frequently Asked Questions


JPO and DIVN have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JPO has higher volatility (5.21%) compared to DIVN (3.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JPO dropped -24.80% vs DIVN's -5.55%.

On 1-year performance, DIVN leads with 22.54% vs 19.08% for JPO. On fees, DIVN is cheaper at 0.70% per year. On volatility, DIVN has been the lower-risk option at 3.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, DIVN has performed better with a 22.54% return vs 19.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DIVN is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 1.19% for JPO.

JPO has the higher dividend yield at 31.81%, compared with 3.70% for DIVN.

JPO is categorized as Options Trading, while DIVN is Large Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: Tidal and Horizon. Their fees differ too: 1.19% for JPO and 0.70% for DIVN.

DIVN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs 0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JPO and DIVN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer