PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JPO vs. AJUL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JPO vs. AJUL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax JPM Option Income Strategy ETF (JPO) and Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr To July 2026 (AJUL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JPO achieves a -4.07% return, which is significantly lower than AJUL's 3.08% return.


JPO

1D
-0.07%
1M
-1.34%
YTD
-4.07%
6M
-0.99%
1Y
12.20%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

AJUL

1D
0.05%
1M
0.69%
YTD
3.08%
6M
3.74%
1Y
9.05%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JPO vs. AJUL - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between JPO and AJUL is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2024

0.47

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JPO vs. AJUL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JPO
JPO Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
JPO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JPO Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
JPO Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
JPO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
JPO Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

AJUL
AJUL Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
AJUL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AJUL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
AJUL Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
AJUL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
AJUL Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JPO vs. AJUL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax JPM Option Income Strategy ETF (JPO) and Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr To July 2026 (AJUL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JPOAJULDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.66

2.84

-2.18

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.96

4.54

-3.58

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.64

-0.52

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.86

4.15

-3.29

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.15

24.50

-22.35

JPO vs. AJUL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JPO Sharpe Ratio is 0.66, which is lower than the AJUL Sharpe Ratio of 2.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JPO and AJUL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JPOAJULDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

2.84

-2.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.70

1.61

-0.91

Drawdowns

JPO vs. AJUL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JPO drawdown since its inception was -24.80%, which is greater than AJUL's maximum drawdown of -6.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JPO and AJUL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JPOAJULDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.80%

-6.06%

-18.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.24%

-2.19%

-12.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.88%

0.00%

-6.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.60%

-0.51%

-4.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.69%

0.37%

+5.32%

Volatility

JPO vs. AJUL - Volatility Comparison

YieldMax JPM Option Income Strategy ETF (JPO) has a higher volatility of 5.97% compared to Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr To July 2026 (AJUL) at 0.17%. This indicates that JPO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AJUL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JPOAJULDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.97%

0.17%

+5.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.16%

2.50%

+12.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.62%

3.20%

+15.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.04%

5.00%

+14.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.04%

5.00%

+14.04%

JPO vs. AJUL - Expense Ratio Comparison

JPO has a 1.19% expense ratio, which is higher than AJUL's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

JPO vs. AJUL - Dividend Comparison

JPO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 34.24%, while AJUL has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023
AJUL
Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr To July 2026
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
JPO
YieldMax JPM Option Income Strategy ETF
34.24%34.13%25.15%4.84%

Frequently Asked Questions


JPO and AJUL have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JPO has higher volatility (5.97%) compared to AJUL (0.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JPO dropped -24.80% vs AJUL's -6.06%.

On 1-year performance, JPO leads with 12.20% vs 9.05% for AJUL. On fees, AJUL is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, AJUL has been the lower-risk option at 0.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, JPO has performed better with a 12.20% return vs 9.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AJUL is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 1.19% for JPO.

JPO has the higher dividend yield at 34.24%, compared with 0.00% for AJUL.

They also come from different issuers: Tidal and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 1.19% for JPO and 0.79% for AJUL.

AJUL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.84 vs 0.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JPO and AJUL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer