JPME vs. SIXL
JPME (JPMorgan Diversified Return US Mid Cap Equity ETF) and SIXL (ETC 6 Meridian Low Beta Equity Strategy ETF) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds. JPME is passively managed, while SIXL is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, JPME returned 8.68%/yr vs 3.56%/yr for SIXL. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. JPME charges 0.24%/yr vs 0.47%/yr for SIXL.
Performance
JPME vs. SIXL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JPME achieves a 13.26% return, which is significantly higher than SIXL's 3.58% return.
JPME
- 1D
- 0.93%
- 1M
- 1.41%
- YTD
- 13.26%
- 6M
- 13.96%
- 1Y
- 23.45%
- 3Y*
- 15.36%
- 5Y*
- 8.68%
- 10Y*
- 11.00%
SIXL
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- -3.27%
- YTD
- 3.58%
- 6M
- 2.46%
- 1Y
- 4.09%
- 3Y*
- 7.66%
- 5Y*
- 3.56%
- 10Y*
- —
JPME vs. SIXL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JPME JPMorgan Diversified Return US Mid Cap Equity ETF | 13.26% | 8.26% | 13.55% | 11.28% | -10.12% | 28.90% | 33.97% |
SIXL ETC 6 Meridian Low Beta Equity Strategy ETF | 3.58% | -0.61% | 14.13% | 2.38% | -7.49% | 20.00% | 18.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between JPME and SIXL is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 12, 2020 | 0.84 |
The correlation between JPME and SIXL shifts across timeframes, from 0.73 (1 year) to 0.84 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
JPME vs. SIXL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
JPME
SIXL
Technology
Real Estate
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Energy
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Technology
JPME
SIXL
Real Estate
JPME
SIXL
Industrials
JPME
SIXL
Healthcare
JPME
SIXL
Consumer Defensive
JPME
SIXL
Utilities
JPME
SIXL
Consumer Cyclical
JPME
SIXL
Financial Services
JPME
SIXL
Energy
JPME
SIXL
Basic Materials
JPME
SIXL
Communication Services
JPME
SIXL
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JPME vs. SIXL — Risk / Return Rank
JPME
SIXL
JPME vs. SIXL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Diversified Return US Mid Cap Equity ETF (JPME) and ETC 6 Meridian Low Beta Equity Strategy ETF (SIXL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JPME | SIXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.95 | 0.43 | +1.52 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.83 | 0.66 | +2.17 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.08 | +0.26 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.40 | 0.55 | +2.86 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.67 | 1.57 | +11.11 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JPME | SIXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.95 | 0.43 | +1.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 | 0.29 | +0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.62 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.64 | 0.63 | +0.01 |
Drawdowns
JPME vs. SIXL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JPME drawdown since its inception was -41.01%, which is greater than SIXL's maximum drawdown of -16.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JPME and SIXL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JPME | SIXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.01% | -16.08% | -24.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.84% | -6.52% | -0.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.70% | -11.65% | -7.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.30% | -16.08% | -3.22% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.01% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -5.89% | +5.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.39% | -4.57% | +0.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.84% | 2.28% | -0.44% |
Volatility
JPME vs. SIXL - Volatility Comparison
JPMorgan Diversified Return US Mid Cap Equity ETF (JPME) has a higher volatility of 3.49% compared to ETC 6 Meridian Low Beta Equity Strategy ETF (SIXL) at 2.41%. This indicates that JPME's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SIXL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JPME | SIXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.49% | 2.41% | +1.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.52% | 6.70% | +1.82% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.06% | 9.51% | +2.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.15% | 12.14% | +4.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.70% | 12.56% | +5.14% |
JPME vs. SIXL - Expense Ratio Comparison
JPME has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is lower than SIXL's 0.47% expense ratio.
Dividends
JPME vs. SIXL - Dividend Comparison
JPME's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.82%, less than SIXL's 2.30% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JPME JPMorgan Diversified Return US Mid Cap Equity ETF | 1.82% | 2.03% | 1.77% | 1.84% | 1.84% | 1.44% | 1.51% | 1.68% | 1.80% | 1.17% | 0.91% |
SIXL ETC 6 Meridian Low Beta Equity Strategy ETF | 2.30% | 2.31% | 1.28% | 1.48% | 1.45% | 0.67% | 0.40% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JPME and SIXL have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
JPME has higher volatility (3.49%) compared to SIXL (2.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JPME dropped -41.01% vs SIXL's -16.08%.
On 5-year performance, JPME leads with 8.68% vs 3.56% for SIXL. On fees, JPME is cheaper at 0.24% per year. On volatility, SIXL has been the lower-risk option at 2.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, JPME has performed better with a 8.68% return vs 3.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
JPME is cheaper with a 0.24% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for SIXL.
SIXL has the higher dividend yield at 2.30%, compared with 1.82% for JPME.
They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Exchange Traded Concepts. Their fees differ too: 0.24% for JPME and 0.47% for SIXL.
JPME currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.95 vs 0.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JPME and SIXL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer