PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JPME vs. LST
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JPME vs. LST - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Diversified Return US Mid Cap Equity ETF (JPME) and Leuthold Select Industries ETF (LST). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JPME achieves a 13.83% return, which is significantly lower than LST's 17.68% return.


JPME

1D
0.36%
1M
1.46%
YTD
13.83%
6M
13.91%
1Y
23.47%
3Y*
15.70%
5Y*
8.70%
10Y*
11.05%

LST

1D
0.75%
1M
6.85%
YTD
17.68%
6M
18.76%
1Y
36.12%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JPME vs. LST - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between JPME and LST is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 22, 2025

0.80

The correlation between JPME and LST has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JPME vs. LST — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JPME
JPME Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
JPME Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JPME Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
JPME Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
JPME Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
JPME Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

LST
LST Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
LST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LST Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
LST Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
LST Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
LST Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JPME vs. LST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Diversified Return US Mid Cap Equity ETF (JPME) and Leuthold Select Industries ETF (LST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JPMELSTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.57

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.69

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.45

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.45

3.35

+0.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.82

13.88

-1.06

JPME vs. LST - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JPME Sharpe Ratio is 1.96, which is comparable to the LST Sharpe Ratio of 2.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JPME and LST, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JPMELSTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.96

2.53

-0.57

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.64

1.42

-0.77

Drawdowns

JPME vs. LST - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JPME drawdown since its inception was -41.01%, which is greater than LST's maximum drawdown of -19.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JPME and LST.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JPMELSTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.01%

-19.47%

-21.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.84%

-10.85%

+4.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.39%

-2.91%

-1.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.84%

2.61%

-0.77%

Volatility

JPME vs. LST - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JPMorgan Diversified Return US Mid Cap Equity ETF (JPME) is 3.30%, while Leuthold Select Industries ETF (LST) has a volatility of 4.02%. This indicates that JPME experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JPMELSTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.30%

4.02%

-0.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.46%

11.73%

-3.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.03%

14.34%

-2.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.15%

17.92%

-1.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.70%

17.92%

-0.22%

JPME vs. LST - Expense Ratio Comparison

JPME has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is lower than LST's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

JPME vs. LST - Dividend Comparison

JPME's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.81%, more than LST's 1.14% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
JPME
JPMorgan Diversified Return US Mid Cap Equity ETF
1.81%2.03%1.77%1.84%1.84%1.44%1.51%1.68%1.80%1.17%0.91%
LST
Leuthold Select Industries ETF
1.14%1.34%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


JPME and LST have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LST has higher volatility (4.02%) compared to JPME (3.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JPME dropped -41.01% vs LST's -19.47%.

On 1-year performance, LST leads with 36.12% vs 23.47% for JPME. On fees, JPME is cheaper at 0.24% per year. On volatility, JPME has been the lower-risk option at 3.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, LST has performed better with a 36.12% return vs 23.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

JPME is cheaper with a 0.24% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for LST.

JPME has the higher dividend yield at 1.81%, compared with 1.14% for LST.

They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Leuthold Group. Their fees differ too: 0.24% for JPME and 0.65% for LST.

LST currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 1.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JPME and LST

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer