JPME vs. FLDZ

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

JPME (JPMorgan Diversified Return US Mid Cap Equity ETF) and FLDZ (RiverNorth Patriot ETF) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds. JPME is passively managed, while FLDZ is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, JPME returned 15.07%/yr vs 13.52%/yr for FLDZ. With a 0.95 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. JPME charges 0.24%/yr vs 0.77%/yr for FLDZ.

Performance

JPME vs. FLDZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Diversified Return US Mid Cap Equity ETF (JPME) and RiverNorth Patriot ETF (FLDZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JPME achieves a 13.31% return, which is significantly higher than FLDZ's 5.89% return.

JPME

• 1D: -0.50%
• 1M: 0.96%
• YTD: 13.31%
• 6M: 12.30%
• 1Y: 21.44%
• 3Y*: 15.07%
• 5Y*: 8.96%
• 10Y*: 11.17%

FLDZ

• 1D: 0.29%
• 1M: 0.87%
• YTD: 5.89%
• 6M: 4.45%
• 1Y: 9.37%
• 3Y*: 13.52%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JPME vs. FLDZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
JPME JPMorgan Diversified Return US Mid Cap Equity ETF	13.31%	8.26%	13.55%	11.28%	-10.12%
FLDZ RiverNorth Patriot ETF	5.89%	6.66%	15.99%	12.15%	-12.07%

Correlation

The correlation between JPME and FLDZ is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.91
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.95
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2022	0.95

The correlation between JPME and FLDZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

JPME vs. FLDZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	JPME	FLDZ
Technology	13.0%	2.8%
Real Estate	11.5%	8.3%
Industrials	11.4%	13.1%
Healthcare	11.2%	12.3%
Consumer Defensive	9.2%	4.9%
Utilities	9.0%	11.6%
Consumer Cyclical	8.9%	14.4%
Financial Services	7.8%	15.6%
Basic Materials	7.2%	1.6%
Energy	7.1%	10.8%
Communication Services	3.7%	4.0%

Return for Risk

JPME vs. FLDZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JPME

JPME Risk / Return Rank: 60
JPME Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
JPME Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
JPME Omega Ratio Rank: 52
JPME Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
JPME Martin Ratio Rank: 68

FLDZ

FLDZ Risk / Return Rank: 26
FLDZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 24
FLDZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 23
FLDZ Omega Ratio Rank: 22
FLDZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 31
FLDZ Martin Ratio Rank: 32

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JPME vs. FLDZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Diversified Return US Mid Cap Equity ETF (JPME) and RiverNorth Patriot ETF (FLDZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	JPME	FLDZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.77	0.82	+0.95
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.58	1.25	+1.33
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.15	+0.16
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.15	1.51	+1.64
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.64	4.56	+7.08

JPME vs. FLDZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JPME Sharpe Ratio is 1.77, which is higher than the FLDZ Sharpe Ratio of 0.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JPME and FLDZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

JPME vs. FLDZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JPME drawdown since its inception was -41.01%, which is greater than FLDZ's maximum drawdown of -19.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JPME and FLDZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	JPME	FLDZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-41.01%	-19.54%	-21.47%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.84%	-6.25%	-0.59%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.70%	-17.43%	-1.27%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.30%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-41.01%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.71%	-1.06%	-0.65%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.37%	-5.92%	+1.55%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.85%	2.06%	-0.21%

Volatility

JPME vs. FLDZ - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan Diversified Return US Mid Cap Equity ETF (JPME) has a higher volatility of 3.37% compared to RiverNorth Patriot ETF (FLDZ) at 2.83%. This indicates that JPME's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLDZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JPME	FLDZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.37%	2.83%	+0.54%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.67%	7.84%	+0.83%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.19%	11.44%	+0.75%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.14%	16.86%	-0.72%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.70%	16.86%	+0.84%

JPME vs. FLDZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

JPME has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is lower than FLDZ's 0.77% expense ratio.

Dividends

JPME vs. FLDZ - Dividend Comparison

JPME's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.82%, more than FLDZ's 1.45% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
FLDZ RiverNorth Patriot ETF	1.45%	1.54%	1.17%	1.39%	1.52%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
JPME JPMorgan Diversified Return US Mid Cap Equity ETF	1.82%	2.03%	1.77%	1.84%	1.84%	1.44%	1.51%	1.68%	1.80%	1.17%	0.91%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JPME and FLDZ in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, JPME and FLDZ move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, JPME or FLDZ?

JPME has higher volatility (3.37%) compared to FLDZ (2.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JPME dropped -41.01% vs FLDZ's -19.54%.

Which ETF is better, JPME or FLDZ?

On 3-year performance, JPME leads with 15.07% vs 13.52% for FLDZ. On fees, JPME is cheaper at 0.24% per year. On volatility, FLDZ has been the lower-risk option at 2.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, JPME or FLDZ?

Over the 3-year period, JPME has performed better with a 15.07% return vs 13.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, JPME or FLDZ?

JPME is cheaper with a 0.24% expense ratio, compared with 0.77% for FLDZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, JPME or FLDZ?

JPME has the higher dividend yield at 1.82%, compared with 1.45% for FLDZ.

What is the main difference between JPME and FLDZ?

They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and RiverNorth. Their fees differ too: 0.24% for JPME and 0.77% for FLDZ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

JPME currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.77 vs 0.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.