PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JPLG.L vs. AVGC.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JPLG.L vs. AVGC.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in JPMorgan Global Equity Multi-Factor UCITS ETF Accumulating (JPLG.L) and Avantis Global Equity UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (AVGC.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

JPLG.L is traded in GBp, while AVGC.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the AVGC.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JPLG.L achieves a 10.76% return, which is significantly lower than AVGC.L's 13.58% return.


JPLG.L

1D
0.68%
1M
3.55%
YTD
10.76%
6M
11.53%
1Y
23.08%
3Y*
13.92%
5Y*
10.40%
10Y*

AVGC.L

1D
-0.06%
1M
4.81%
YTD
13.58%
6M
14.58%
1Y
32.11%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JPLG.L vs. AVGC.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between JPLG.L and AVGC.L is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 29, 2025

0.69

The correlation between JPLG.L and AVGC.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JPLG.L vs. AVGC.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JPLG.L
JPLG.L Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
JPLG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JPLG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
JPLG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
JPLG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
JPLG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

AVGC.L
AVGC.L Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
AVGC.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVGC.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVGC.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
AVGC.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVGC.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JPLG.L vs. AVGC.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Global Equity Multi-Factor UCITS ETF Accumulating (JPLG.L) and Avantis Global Equity UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (AVGC.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JPLG.LAVGC.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

1.52

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.11

5.22

-1.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.36

19.61

-4.25

JPLG.L vs. AVGC.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JPLG.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.92, which is comparable to the AVGC.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JPLG.L and AVGC.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JPLG.LAVGC.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.92

2.79

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.69

3.12

-2.43

Drawdowns

JPLG.L vs. AVGC.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JPLG.L drawdown since its inception was -27.53%, which is greater than AVGC.L's maximum drawdown of -6.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JPLG.L and AVGC.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JPLG.LAVGC.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.53%

-6.12%

-21.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.59%

-6.12%

+0.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.06%

+0.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.30%

-0.92%

-2.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.50%

1.63%

-0.13%

Volatility

JPLG.L vs. AVGC.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JPMorgan Global Equity Multi-Factor UCITS ETF Accumulating (JPLG.L) is 1.96%, while Avantis Global Equity UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (AVGC.L) has a volatility of 3.62%. This indicates that JPLG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AVGC.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JPLG.LAVGC.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.96%

3.62%

-1.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.88%

8.86%

-2.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.88%

11.49%

-3.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.90%

12.00%

-1.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.75%

12.00%

+1.75%

JPLG.L vs. AVGC.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

JPLG.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than AVGC.L's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

JPLG.L vs. AVGC.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither JPLG.L nor AVGC.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


JPLG.L and AVGC.L have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, JPLG.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

JPLG.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for AVGC.L.

JPLG.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD, while AVGC.L tracks MSCI World IMI Index. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Avantis. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for JPLG.L and 0.35% for AVGC.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JPLG.L and AVGC.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer