JPIN vs. UMMA
JPIN (J.P. Morgan Diversified Return International Equity ETF) and UMMA (Wahed Dow Jones Islamic World ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds - JPIN tracks the JPMorgan Diversified Factor International Equity Index while UMMA tracks the Dow Jones Islamic Market International Titans 100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, JPIN returned 17.85%/yr vs 22.73%/yr for UMMA. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. JPIN charges 0.37%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for UMMA.
Performance
JPIN vs. UMMA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JPIN achieves a 9.44% return, which is significantly lower than UMMA's 32.49% return.
JPIN
- 1D
- -0.74%
- 1M
- 2.05%
- YTD
- 9.44%
- 6M
- 11.10%
- 1Y
- 23.67%
- 3Y*
- 17.85%
- 5Y*
- 7.89%
- 10Y*
- 7.75%
UMMA
- 1D
- -0.77%
- 1M
- 14.49%
- YTD
- 32.49%
- 6M
- 35.58%
- 1Y
- 53.55%
- 3Y*
- 22.73%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JPIN vs. UMMA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JPIN J.P. Morgan Diversified Return International Equity ETF | 9.44% | 33.27% | 2.66% | 17.45% | -14.19% |
UMMA Wahed Dow Jones Islamic World ETF | 32.49% | 26.65% | 4.67% | 18.84% | -21.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between JPIN and UMMA is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 10, 2022 | 0.81 |
The correlation between JPIN and UMMA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.
JPIN vs. UMMA - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
JPIN
UMMA
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Utilities
-
Financial Services
-
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Real Estate
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Energy
Industrials
JPIN
UMMA
Consumer Defensive
JPIN
UMMA
Healthcare
JPIN
UMMA
Utilities
JPIN
UMMA
-
Financial Services
JPIN
UMMA
-
Basic Materials
JPIN
UMMA
Communication Services
JPIN
UMMA
Real Estate
JPIN
UMMA
Consumer Cyclical
JPIN
UMMA
Technology
JPIN
UMMA
Energy
JPIN
UMMA
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JPIN vs. UMMA — Risk / Return Rank
JPIN
UMMA
JPIN vs. UMMA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for J.P. Morgan Diversified Return International Equity ETF (JPIN) and Wahed Dow Jones Islamic World ETF (UMMA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JPIN | UMMA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.93 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.46 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.28 | 3.60 | -1.32 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.07 | 14.07 | -6.00 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JPIN | UMMA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.75 | 2.68 | -0.93 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.55 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.49 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | 0.58 | -0.14 |
Drawdowns
JPIN vs. UMMA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JPIN drawdown since its inception was -36.69%, which is greater than UMMA's maximum drawdown of -34.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JPIN and UMMA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JPIN | UMMA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.69% | -34.17% | -2.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.41% | -14.93% | +4.52% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.32% | -18.73% | +6.41% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.61% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.69% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.12% | -0.77% | -2.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.02% | -9.82% | +2.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.94% | 3.82% | -0.88% |
Volatility
JPIN vs. UMMA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for J.P. Morgan Diversified Return International Equity ETF (JPIN) is 4.53%, while Wahed Dow Jones Islamic World ETF (UMMA) has a volatility of 7.64%. This indicates that JPIN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UMMA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JPIN | UMMA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.53% | 7.64% | -3.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.36% | 17.26% | -5.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.62% | 20.10% | -6.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.54% | 20.55% | -6.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.01% | 20.55% | -4.54% |
JPIN vs. UMMA - Expense Ratio Comparison
JPIN has a 0.37% expense ratio, which is lower than UMMA's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
JPIN vs. UMMA - Dividend Comparison
JPIN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.11%, more than UMMA's 0.93% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JPIN J.P. Morgan Diversified Return International Equity ETF | 4.11% | 4.50% | 4.20% | 6.22% | 3.06% | 5.03% | 2.45% | 3.30% | 2.72% | 2.12% | 1.67% | 2.18% |
UMMA Wahed Dow Jones Islamic World ETF | 0.93% | 1.02% | 0.91% | 1.09% | 1.77% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JPIN and UMMA have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UMMA has higher volatility (7.64%) compared to JPIN (4.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JPIN dropped -36.69% vs UMMA's -34.17%.
On 3-year performance, UMMA leads with 22.73% vs 17.85% for JPIN. On fees, JPIN is cheaper at 0.37% per year. On volatility, JPIN has been the lower-risk option at 4.53%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, UMMA has performed better with a 22.73% return vs 17.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
JPIN is cheaper with a 0.37% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for UMMA.
JPIN has the higher dividend yield at 4.11%, compared with 0.93% for UMMA.
JPIN tracks JPMorgan Diversified Factor International Equity Index, while UMMA tracks Dow Jones Islamic Market International Titans 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Wahed. Their fees differ too: 0.37% for JPIN and 0.65% for UMMA.
UMMA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.68 vs 1.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JPIN and UMMA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer