JPIE vs. AINP
JPIE (JPMorgan Income ETF) and AINP (Allspring Income Plus ETF) are both Multisector Bonds funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, JPIE returned 5.90% vs 6.37% for AINP. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. JPIE charges 0.41%/yr vs 0.36%/yr for AINP.
Performance
JPIE vs. AINP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JPIE achieves a 1.43% return, which is significantly higher than AINP's 1.11% return.
JPIE
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- 0.37%
- YTD
- 1.43%
- 6M
- 1.83%
- 1Y
- 5.90%
- 3Y*
- 6.43%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AINP
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- 0.72%
- YTD
- 1.11%
- 6M
- 1.44%
- 1Y
- 6.37%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JPIE vs. AINP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
JPIE JPMorgan Income ETF | 1.43% | 7.39% | -0.05% |
AINP Allspring Income Plus ETF | 1.11% | 7.53% | -1.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between JPIE and AINP is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 6, 2024 | 0.68 |
The correlation between JPIE and AINP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JPIE vs. AINP — Risk / Return Rank
JPIE
AINP
JPIE vs. AINP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Income ETF (JPIE) and Allspring Income Plus ETF (AINP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JPIE | AINP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.77 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.89 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.84 | 1.39 | +0.45 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.16 | 2.55 | +2.61 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 25.53 | 10.47 | +15.06 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JPIE | AINP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.73 | 1.96 | +1.77 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.98 | 1.36 | -0.38 |
Drawdowns
JPIE vs. AINP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JPIE drawdown since its inception was -9.96%, which is greater than AINP's maximum drawdown of -2.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JPIE and AINP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JPIE | AINP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.96% | -2.61% | -7.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.15% | -2.51% | +1.36% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -2.40% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.13% | -0.22% | +0.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.10% | -0.47% | -1.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.23% | 0.61% | -0.38% |
Volatility
JPIE vs. AINP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for JPMorgan Income ETF (JPIE) is 0.60%, while Allspring Income Plus ETF (AINP) has a volatility of 1.14%. This indicates that JPIE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AINP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JPIE | AINP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.60% | 1.14% | -0.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.28% | 2.45% | -1.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.59% | 3.27% | -1.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.52% | 3.63% | -0.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.52% | 3.63% | -0.11% |
JPIE vs. AINP - Expense Ratio Comparison
JPIE has a 0.41% expense ratio, which is higher than AINP's 0.36% expense ratio.
Dividends
JPIE vs. AINP - Dividend Comparison
JPIE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.62%, less than AINP's 5.78% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AINP Allspring Income Plus ETF | 5.78% | 5.03% | 0.47% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
JPIE JPMorgan Income ETF | 5.62% | 5.65% | 6.11% | 5.70% | 4.49% | 0.63% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JPIE and AINP have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AINP has higher volatility (1.14%) compared to JPIE (0.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JPIE dropped -9.96% vs AINP's -2.61%.
On 1-year performance, AINP leads with 6.37% vs 5.90% for JPIE. On fees, AINP is cheaper at 0.36% per year. On volatility, JPIE has been the lower-risk option at 0.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, AINP has performed better with a 6.37% return vs 5.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
AINP is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 0.41% for JPIE.
AINP has the higher dividend yield at 5.78%, compared with 5.62% for JPIE.
They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Allspring. Their fees differ too: 0.41% for JPIE and 0.36% for AINP.
JPIE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.73 vs 1.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JPIE and AINP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer