PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JPIB vs. SKOR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JPIB vs. SKOR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan International Bond Opportunities ETF (JPIB) and FlexShares Credit-Scored US Corporate Bond Index Fund (SKOR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JPIB achieves a 1.10% return, which is significantly higher than SKOR's 0.54% return.


JPIB

1D
0.17%
1M
1.08%
YTD
1.10%
6M
1.62%
1Y
5.24%
3Y*
5.93%
5Y*
2.76%
10Y*

SKOR

1D
-0.05%
1M
0.37%
YTD
0.54%
6M
1.02%
1Y
5.20%
3Y*
6.13%
5Y*
1.74%
10Y*
2.88%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JPIB vs. SKOR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JPIB
JPMorgan International Bond Opportunities ETF
1.10%8.19%3.48%8.68%-6.38%0.14%7.14%10.76%-2.17%2.61%
SKOR
FlexShares Credit-Scored US Corporate Bond Index Fund
0.54%7.99%4.42%7.64%-9.88%-1.40%8.84%10.69%-1.25%1.41%

Correlation

The correlation between JPIB and SKOR is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 5, 2017

0.47

Over the past year, JPIB and SKOR have become more correlated (0.73) than their long-term average of 0.47, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JPIB vs. SKOR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JPIB
JPIB Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
JPIB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JPIB Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
JPIB Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
JPIB Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
JPIB Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

SKOR
SKOR Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
SKOR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SKOR Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
SKOR Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
SKOR Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
SKOR Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JPIB vs. SKOR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan International Bond Opportunities ETF (JPIB) and FlexShares Credit-Scored US Corporate Bond Index Fund (SKOR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JPIBSKORDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.48

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.83

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.34

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.29

2.38

-1.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.42

8.31

-3.89

JPIB vs. SKOR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JPIB Sharpe Ratio is 1.36, which is comparable to the SKOR Sharpe Ratio of 1.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JPIB and SKOR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JPIB vs. SKOR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JPIB drawdown since its inception was -13.13%, smaller than the maximum SKOR drawdown of -15.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JPIB and SKOR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JPIBSKORDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.13%

-15.98%

+2.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.75%

-2.09%

-1.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.75%

-3.11%

-0.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.83%

-15.13%

+3.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-15.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.77%

-0.57%

-0.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.93%

-2.65%

+0.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.09%

0.60%

+0.49%

Volatility

JPIB vs. SKOR - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan International Bond Opportunities ETF (JPIB) has a higher volatility of 1.19% compared to FlexShares Credit-Scored US Corporate Bond Index Fund (SKOR) at 0.94%. This indicates that JPIB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SKOR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JPIBSKORDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.19%

0.94%

+0.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.07%

2.04%

+1.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.58%

2.71%

+0.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.12%

4.43%

-0.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.44%

4.90%

-0.46%

JPIB vs. SKOR - Expense Ratio Comparison

JPIB has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than SKOR's 0.22% expense ratio.


Dividends

JPIB vs. SKOR - Dividend Comparison

JPIB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.00%, more than SKOR's 4.66% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JPIB
JPMorgan International Bond Opportunities ETF
5.00%4.85%4.57%4.35%3.10%2.59%3.14%4.66%5.83%1.81%0.00%0.00%
SKOR
FlexShares Credit-Scored US Corporate Bond Index Fund
4.66%4.70%4.90%3.90%2.57%2.55%3.38%3.53%2.85%2.46%2.74%2.25%

Frequently Asked Questions


JPIB and SKOR have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JPIB has higher volatility (1.19%) compared to SKOR (0.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JPIB dropped -13.13% vs SKOR's -15.98%.

On 5-year performance, JPIB leads with 2.76% vs 1.74% for SKOR. On fees, SKOR is cheaper at 0.22% per year. On volatility, SKOR has been the lower-risk option at 0.94%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, JPIB has performed better with a 2.76% return vs 1.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SKOR is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for JPIB.

JPIB has the higher dividend yield at 5.00%, compared with 4.66% for SKOR.

JPIB is categorized as Global Bonds, while SKOR is Corporate Bonds. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Northern Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for JPIB and 0.22% for SKOR.

SKOR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.84 vs 1.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JPIB and SKOR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer