JPIB vs. DFGX

Last updated Aug 5, 2026

JPIB (JPMorgan International Bond Opportunities ETF) and DFGX (Dimensional Global Ex US Core Fixed Income ETF) are both Global Bonds funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, JPIB returned 3.44% vs 1.92% for DFGX. Their 0.69 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. JPIB charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for DFGX.

Performance

JPIB vs. DFGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan International Bond Opportunities ETF (JPIB) and Dimensional Global Ex US Core Fixed Income ETF (DFGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JPIB achieves a 1.23% return, which is significantly higher than DFGX's 1.14% return.

JPIB

• 1D: 0.29%
• 1M: -0.28%
• 6M: 0.28%
• YTD: 1.23%
• 1Y: 3.44%
• 3Y*: 5.98%
• 5Y*: 2.79%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 3.57%

DFGX

• 1D: 0.27%
• 1M: -0.41%
• 6M: 0.50%
• YTD: 1.14%
• 1Y: 1.92%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 4.88%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
DFGX Dimensional Global Ex US Core Fixed Income ETF	$7.47M	$7.91M	$8.42M
JPIB JPMorgan International Bond Opportunities ETF	$8.02M	$9.19M	$9.55M

JPIB vs. DFGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
JPIB JPMorgan International Bond Opportunities ETF	1.23%	8.19%	3.48%	5.46%
DFGX Dimensional Global Ex US Core Fixed Income ETF	1.14%	3.46%	3.75%	4.95%

Correlation

The correlation between JPIB and DFGX is 0.73, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.73
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 8, 2023	0.69

The correlation between JPIB and DFGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

JPIB vs. DFGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

JPIB

JPIB Risk / Return Rank: 32
JPIB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
JPIB Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
JPIB Omega Ratio Rank: 35
JPIB Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
JPIB Martin Ratio Rank: 31

DFGX

DFGX Risk / Return Rank: 19
DFGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
DFGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 18
DFGX Omega Ratio Rank: 18
DFGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 19
DFGX Martin Ratio Rank: 21

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

JPIB vs. DFGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan International Bond Opportunities ETF (JPIB) and Dimensional Global Ex US Core Fixed Income ETF (DFGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	JPIB	DFGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.97	0.46	+0.51
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.37	0.69	+0.68
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	1.08	+0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.92	0.58	+0.34
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.01	1.58	+1.44

JPIB vs. DFGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JPIB Sharpe Ratio is 0.97, which is higher than the DFGX Sharpe Ratio of 0.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JPIB and DFGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

JPIB vs. DFGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JPIB drawdown since its inception was -13.13%, which is greater than DFGX's maximum drawdown of -3.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JPIB and DFGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	JPIB	DFGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-13.13%	-3.32%	-9.81%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.75%	-3.32%	-0.43%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-3.75%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-11.83%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.64%	-1.01%	+0.37%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.91%	-0.79%	-1.12%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.14%	1.22%	-0.08%

Volatility

JPIB vs. DFGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JPMorgan International Bond Opportunities ETF (JPIB) is 0.84%, while Dimensional Global Ex US Core Fixed Income ETF (DFGX) has a volatility of 1.16%. This indicates that JPIB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DFGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JPIB	DFGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.84%	1.16%	-0.32%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.16%	3.55%	-0.39%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.57%	4.15%	-0.58%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.13%	4.61%	-0.48%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.42%	4.61%	-0.19%

JPIB vs. DFGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JPIB has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than DFGX's 0.20% expense ratio.

Dividends

JPIB vs. DFGX - Dividend Comparison

JPIB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.85%, more than DFGX's 4.11% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
DFGX Dimensional Global Ex US Core Fixed Income ETF	4.11%	2.84%	4.61%	0.49%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
JPIB JPMorgan International Bond Opportunities ETF	4.85%	4.85%	4.57%	4.35%	3.10%	2.59%	3.14%	4.66%	5.83%	1.81%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JPIB and DFGX in my portfolio?

JPIB and DFGX have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, JPIB or DFGX?

DFGX has higher volatility (1.16%) compared to JPIB (0.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JPIB dropped -13.13% vs DFGX's -3.32%.

Which ETF is better, JPIB or DFGX?

On 1-year performance, JPIB leads with 3.44% vs 1.92% for DFGX. On fees, DFGX is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, JPIB has been the lower-risk option at 0.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, JPIB or DFGX?

Over the 1-year period, JPIB has performed better with a 3.44% return vs 1.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, JPIB or DFGX?

DFGX is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for JPIB.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, JPIB or DFGX?

JPIB has the higher dividend yield at 4.85%, compared with 4.11% for DFGX.

What is the main difference between JPIB and DFGX?

They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Dimensional. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for JPIB and 0.20% for DFGX.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

JPIB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.97 vs 0.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.