JPHY vs. IBHJ
JPHY (JPMorgan High Yield Research Enhanced ETF) and IBHJ (iShares iBonds 2030 Term High Yield and Income ETF) are both High Yield Bonds funds. JPHY is actively managed, while IBHJ is passively managed. Over the past year, JPHY returned 5.98% vs 6.49% for IBHJ. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. JPHY charges 0.24%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for IBHJ.
Performance
JPHY vs. IBHJ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with JPHY having a 2.22% return and IBHJ slightly lower at 2.12%.
JPHY
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- -0.00%
- 6M
- 1.78%
- YTD
- 2.22%
- 1Y
- 5.98%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IBHJ
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 0.23%
- 6M
- 1.82%
- YTD
- 2.12%
- 1Y
- 6.49%
- 3Y*
- 8.43%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JPHY vs. IBHJ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
JPHY JPMorgan High Yield Research Enhanced ETF | 2.22% | 4.06% |
IBHJ iShares iBonds 2030 Term High Yield and Income ETF | 2.12% | 4.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between JPHY and IBHJ is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2025 | 0.81 |
The correlation between JPHY and IBHJ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JPHY vs. IBHJ — Risk / Return Rank
JPHY
IBHJ
JPHY vs. IBHJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan High Yield Research Enhanced ETF (JPHY) and iShares iBonds 2030 Term High Yield and Income ETF (IBHJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| JPHY | IBHJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.43 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.84 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.30 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.64 | 2.65 | +0.98 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.80 | 11.90 | +4.90 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
JPHY vs. IBHJ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JPHY drawdown since its inception was -1.65%, smaller than the maximum IBHJ drawdown of -4.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JPHY and IBHJ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JPHY | IBHJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.65% | -4.93% | +3.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.65% | -2.46% | +0.81% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -4.93% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.49% | -0.62% | +0.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.21% | -0.61% | +0.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.36% | 0.55% | -0.19% |
Volatility
JPHY vs. IBHJ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for JPMorgan High Yield Research Enhanced ETF (JPHY) is 0.67%, while iShares iBonds 2030 Term High Yield and Income ETF (IBHJ) has a volatility of 1.02%. This indicates that JPHY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBHJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JPHY | IBHJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.67% | 1.02% | -0.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.33% | 3.32% | -0.99% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.00% | 4.14% | -1.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.97% | 5.88% | -2.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.97% | 5.88% | -2.91% |
JPHY vs. IBHJ - Expense Ratio Comparison
JPHY has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is lower than IBHJ's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
JPHY vs. IBHJ - Dividend Comparison
JPHY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.48%, less than IBHJ's 6.67% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
IBHJ iShares iBonds 2030 Term High Yield and Income ETF | 6.67% | 6.64% | 6.87% | 3.66% |
JPHY JPMorgan High Yield Research Enhanced ETF | 6.48% | 3.32% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JPHY and IBHJ have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IBHJ has higher volatility (1.02%) compared to JPHY (0.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JPHY dropped -1.65% vs IBHJ's -4.93%.
On 1-year performance, IBHJ leads with 6.49% vs 5.98% for JPHY. On fees, JPHY is cheaper at 0.24% per year. On volatility, JPHY has been the lower-risk option at 0.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, IBHJ has performed better with a 6.49% return vs 5.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
JPHY is cheaper with a 0.24% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for IBHJ.
IBHJ has the higher dividend yield at 6.67%, compared with 6.48% for JPHY.
They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.24% for JPHY and 0.35% for IBHJ.
JPHY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.00 vs 1.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JPHY and IBHJ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer