PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JPHY vs. HYLB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JPHY vs. HYLB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan High Yield Research Enhanced ETF (JPHY) and Xtrackers USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYLB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JPHY achieves a 2.24% return, which is significantly higher than HYLB's 1.73% return.


JPHY

1D
0.02%
1M
0.26%
YTD
2.24%
6M
2.21%
1Y
6.32%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

HYLB

1D
0.03%
1M
0.16%
YTD
1.73%
6M
1.70%
1Y
5.91%
3Y*
8.93%
5Y*
3.92%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JPHY vs. HYLB - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between JPHY and HYLB is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2025

0.87

The correlation between JPHY and HYLB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JPHY vs. HYLB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JPHY
JPHY Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
JPHY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JPHY Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
JPHY Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
JPHY Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
JPHY Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

HYLB
HYLB Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
HYLB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYLB Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYLB Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
HYLB Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYLB Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JPHY vs. HYLB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan High Yield Research Enhanced ETF (JPHY) and Xtrackers USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYLB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JPHYHYLBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.54

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.96

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.31

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.85

2.61

+1.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.77

11.16

+6.61

JPHY vs. HYLB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JPHY Sharpe Ratio is 2.12, which is higher than the HYLB Sharpe Ratio of 1.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JPHY and HYLB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JPHY vs. HYLB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JPHY drawdown since its inception was -1.65%, smaller than the maximum HYLB drawdown of -22.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JPHY and HYLB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JPHYHYLBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.65%

-22.91%

+21.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.65%

-2.27%

+0.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.13%

-0.16%

+0.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.21%

-2.42%

+2.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.36%

0.53%

-0.17%

Volatility

JPHY vs. HYLB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JPMorgan High Yield Research Enhanced ETF (JPHY) is 0.61%, while Xtrackers USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYLB) has a volatility of 1.00%. This indicates that JPHY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HYLB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JPHYHYLBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.61%

1.00%

-0.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.31%

3.01%

-0.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.00%

3.75%

-0.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.00%

7.48%

-4.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.00%

8.16%

-5.16%

JPHY vs. HYLB - Expense Ratio Comparison

JPHY has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is higher than HYLB's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

JPHY vs. HYLB - Dividend Comparison

JPHY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.91%, less than HYLB's 6.47% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
HYLB
Xtrackers USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
6.47%6.29%6.31%5.84%5.53%4.45%5.22%5.71%5.95%5.85%0.27%
JPHY
JPMorgan High Yield Research Enhanced ETF
5.91%3.32%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


JPHY and HYLB have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HYLB has higher volatility (1.00%) compared to JPHY (0.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JPHY dropped -1.65% vs HYLB's -22.91%.

On 1-year performance, JPHY leads with 6.32% vs 5.91% for HYLB. On fees, HYLB is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, JPHY has been the lower-risk option at 0.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, JPHY has performed better with a 6.32% return vs 5.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HYLB is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.24% for JPHY.

HYLB has the higher dividend yield at 6.47%, compared with 5.91% for JPHY.

They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and DWS. Their fees differ too: 0.24% for JPHY and 0.15% for HYLB.

JPHY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 1.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JPHY and HYLB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer