JPHY vs. FALN

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

JPHY (JPMorgan High Yield Research Enhanced ETF) and FALN (iShares Fallen Angels USD Bond ETF) are both High Yield Bonds funds. JPHY is actively managed, while FALN is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. JPHY charges 0.24%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for FALN.

Performance

JPHY vs. FALN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan High Yield Research Enhanced ETF (JPHY) and iShares Fallen Angels USD Bond ETF (FALN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JPHY achieves a 2.07% return, which is significantly higher than FALN's 1.56% return.

JPHY

• 1D: -0.09%
• 1M: 0.44%
• YTD: 2.07%
• 6M: 2.33%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FALN

• 1D: -0.22%
• 1M: 0.68%
• YTD: 1.56%
• 6M: 1.36%
• 1Y: 8.66%
• 3Y*: 9.18%
• 5Y*: 3.78%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JPHY vs. FALN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
JPHY JPMorgan High Yield Research Enhanced ETF	2.07%	4.00%
FALN iShares Fallen Angels USD Bond ETF	1.56%	5.28%

Correlation

The correlation between JPHY and FALN is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025	0.84

JPHY vs. FALN - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	JPHY	FALN
Communication Services	15.8%	-
Industrials	10.8%	-
Consumer Cyclical	8.9%	-
Energy	7.0%	-
Healthcare	5.1%	-
Technology	4.8%	-
Basic Materials	3.6%	-
Real Estate	3.0%	100.0%
Utilities	2.8%	-
Consumer Defensive	2.4%	-
Financial Services	1.8%	-

Return for Risk

JPHY vs. FALN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FALN

FALN Risk / Return Rank: 54
FALN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
FALN Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
FALN Omega Ratio Rank: 60
FALN Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
FALN Martin Ratio Rank: 53

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JPHY vs. FALN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan High Yield Research Enhanced ETF (JPHY) and iShares Fallen Angels USD Bond ETF (FALN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	JPHY	FALN	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.91	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.52	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.17	0.74	+1.43

Drawdowns

JPHY vs. FALN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JPHY drawdown since its inception was -1.65%, smaller than the maximum FALN drawdown of -29.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JPHY and FALN.

Drawdown Indicators

	JPHY	FALN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-1.65%	-29.22%	+27.57%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-3.96%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-5.92%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-18.78%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.09%	-0.26%	+0.17%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.21%	-3.32%	+3.11%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.95%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	JPHY	FALN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	1.38%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	3.64%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.04%	4.54%	-1.50%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.04%	7.31%	-4.27%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.04%	8.95%	-5.91%

JPHY vs. FALN - Expense Ratio Comparison

JPHY has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is lower than FALN's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

JPHY vs. FALN - Dividend Comparison

JPHY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.92%, less than FALN's 6.46% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
FALN iShares Fallen Angels USD Bond ETF	6.46%	6.31%	6.24%	5.37%	5.08%	3.40%	5.14%	5.35%	5.97%	6.98%	3.55%
JPHY JPMorgan High Yield Research Enhanced ETF	5.92%	3.32%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JPHY and FALN in my portfolio?

JPHY and FALN have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, JPHY or FALN?

On fees, JPHY is cheaper at 0.24% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, JPHY or FALN?

JPHY is cheaper with a 0.24% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for FALN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, JPHY or FALN?

FALN has the higher dividend yield at 6.46%, compared with 5.92% for JPHY.

What is the main difference between JPHY and FALN?

They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.24% for JPHY and 0.25% for FALN.