PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JPHSX vs. FRFZX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JPHSX vs. FRFZX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Floating Rate Income Fund (JPHSX) and PGIM Floating Rate Income Fund (FRFZX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JPHSX achieves a 1.33% return, which is significantly lower than FRFZX's 2.29% return. Over the past 10 years, JPHSX has underperformed FRFZX with an annualized return of 3.81%, while FRFZX has yielded a comparatively higher 5.36% annualized return.


JPHSX

1D
0.13%
1M
0.61%
YTD
1.33%
6M
1.95%
1Y
3.40%
3Y*
5.46%
5Y*
3.91%
10Y*
3.81%

FRFZX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.65%
YTD
2.29%
6M
3.07%
1Y
6.22%
3Y*
8.74%
5Y*
5.83%
10Y*
5.36%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JPHSX vs. FRFZX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JPHSX
JPMorgan Floating Rate Income Fund
1.33%0.89%7.14%11.07%-2.13%4.57%1.28%7.15%-0.31%3.05%
FRFZX
PGIM Floating Rate Income Fund
2.29%5.66%9.45%14.11%-3.56%5.46%4.62%7.47%-0.13%4.48%

Correlation

The correlation between JPHSX and FRFZX is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.36

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 3, 2011

0.52

The correlation between JPHSX and FRFZX shifts across timeframes, from 0.36 (3 years) to 0.52 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JPHSX vs. FRFZX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JPHSX
JPHSX Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
JPHSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JPHSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
JPHSX Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
JPHSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
JPHSX Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

FRFZX
FRFZX Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
FRFZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRFZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRFZX Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
FRFZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRFZX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JPHSX vs. FRFZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Floating Rate Income Fund (JPHSX) and PGIM Floating Rate Income Fund (FRFZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JPHSXFRFZXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.46

2.69

-1.22

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.77

6.64

-4.87

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

2.02

-0.59

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.36

7.99

-5.63

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.49

24.98

-18.49

JPHSX vs. FRFZX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JPHSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.46, which is lower than the FRFZX Sharpe Ratio of 2.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JPHSX and FRFZX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JPHSXFRFZXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.46

2.69

-1.22

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.73

1.89

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.05

1.36

-0.31

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.10

1.41

-0.31

Drawdowns

JPHSX vs. FRFZX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JPHSX drawdown since its inception was -20.95%, roughly equal to the maximum FRFZX drawdown of -21.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JPHSX and FRFZX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JPHSXFRFZXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.95%

-21.95%

+1.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.28%

-0.85%

-0.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.10%

-3.12%

-0.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-6.84%

-7.85%

+1.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.95%

-21.95%

+1.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.01%

-0.91%

-0.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.46%

0.27%

+0.19%

Volatility

JPHSX vs. FRFZX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JPMorgan Floating Rate Income Fund (JPHSX) is 0.32%, while PGIM Floating Rate Income Fund (FRFZX) has a volatility of 0.59%. This indicates that JPHSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FRFZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JPHSXFRFZXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.32%

0.59%

-0.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.37%

1.72%

-0.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.07%

2.33%

-0.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.27%

3.09%

-0.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.65%

3.97%

-0.32%

JPHSX vs. FRFZX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JPHSX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than FRFZX's 0.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

JPHSX vs. FRFZX - Dividend Comparison

JPHSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.00%, less than FRFZX's 7.40% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FRFZX
PGIM Floating Rate Income Fund
7.40%7.65%8.76%8.87%6.41%3.33%5.35%5.42%5.06%4.90%4.34%3.97%
JPHSX
JPMorgan Floating Rate Income Fund
7.00%6.84%9.21%7.94%5.12%3.34%3.88%5.27%4.57%3.78%4.49%4.52%

Frequently Asked Questions


JPHSX and FRFZX have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FRFZX has higher volatility (0.59%) compared to JPHSX (0.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JPHSX dropped -20.95% vs FRFZX's -21.95%.

FRFZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.69 vs 1.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JPHSX and FRFZX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer