PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JPEF vs. CNAV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JPEF vs. CNAV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Equity Focus ETF (JPEF) and Mohr Company Nav ETF (CNAV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JPEF achieves a 7.28% return, which is significantly lower than CNAV's 24.51% return.


JPEF

1D
1.05%
1M
0.24%
6M
5.98%
YTD
7.28%
1Y
15.49%
3Y*
17.71%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
17.66%

CNAV

1D
0.63%
1M
-10.01%
6M
18.26%
YTD
24.51%
1Y
39.18%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
26.73%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$249.12K$293.43K$339.76K
$8.69M$8.49M$7.43M

JPEF vs. CNAV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
JPEF
JPMorgan Equity Focus ETF
7.28%12.07%3.13%
CNAV
Mohr Company Nav ETF
24.51%16.80%6.05%

Correlation

The correlation between JPEF and CNAV is 0.71, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2024

0.75

The correlation between JPEF and CNAV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JPEF vs. CNAV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

JPEF
JPEF Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
JPEF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JPEF Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
JPEF Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
JPEF Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
JPEF Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

CNAV
CNAV Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
CNAV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CNAV Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
CNAV Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
CNAV Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
CNAV Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

JPEF vs. CNAV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Equity Focus ETF (JPEF) and Mohr Company Nav ETF (CNAV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JPEFCNAVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.20

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.65

1.40

+0.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.78

6.25

+0.54

JPEF vs. CNAV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JPEF Sharpe Ratio is 1.09, which is comparable to the CNAV Sharpe Ratio of 1.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JPEF and CNAV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JPEF vs. CNAV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JPEF drawdown since its inception was -18.09%, smaller than the maximum CNAV drawdown of -30.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JPEF and CNAV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JPEFCNAVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.09%

-30.06%

+11.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.25%

-25.80%

+17.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.36%

-20.15%

+18.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.13%

-5.84%

+3.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.00%

5.79%

-3.79%

Volatility

JPEF vs. CNAV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JPMorgan Equity Focus ETF (JPEF) is 3.96%, while Mohr Company Nav ETF (CNAV) has a volatility of 15.97%. This indicates that JPEF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CNAV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JPEFCNAVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.96%

15.97%

-12.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.89%

31.59%

-21.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.52%

34.30%

-21.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.02%

31.45%

-16.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.02%

31.45%

-16.43%

JPEF vs. CNAV - Expense Ratio Comparison

JPEF has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than CNAV's 1.31% expense ratio.


Dividends

JPEF vs. CNAV - Dividend Comparison

JPEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.65%, while CNAV has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023
CNAV
Mohr Company Nav ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
JPEF
JPMorgan Equity Focus ETF
0.65%0.70%0.71%0.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


JPEF and CNAV have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CNAV has higher volatility (15.97%) compared to JPEF (3.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JPEF dropped -18.09% vs CNAV's -30.06%.

On 1-year performance, CNAV leads with 39.18% vs 15.49% for JPEF. On fees, JPEF is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, JPEF has been the lower-risk option at 3.96%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, CNAV has performed better with a 39.18% return vs 15.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

JPEF is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 1.31% for CNAV.

JPEF has the higher dividend yield at 0.65%, compared with 0.00% for CNAV.

They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Mohr. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for JPEF and 1.31% for CNAV.

JPEF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.09 vs 1.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JPEF and CNAV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer