PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JPCT.DE vs. XDEB.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JPCT.DE vs. XDEB.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in JPMorgan Carbon Transition Global Equity UCITS ETF USD (acc) (JPCT.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1C (XDEB.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JPCT.DE achieves a 7.39% return, which is significantly higher than XDEB.DE's 1.74% return.


JPCT.DE

1D
0.24%
1M
4.31%
YTD
7.39%
6M
7.70%
1Y
18.63%
3Y*
15.09%
5Y*
11.53%
10Y*

XDEB.DE

1D
-0.04%
1M
1.52%
YTD
1.74%
6M
1.86%
1Y
-0.08%
3Y*
6.45%
5Y*
6.21%
10Y*
6.88%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JPCT.DE vs. XDEB.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
JPCT.DE
JPMorgan Carbon Transition Global Equity UCITS ETF USD (acc)
7.39%6.84%24.37%19.66%-14.19%34.64%2.14%
XDEB.DE
Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1C
1.74%-1.27%17.83%3.66%-4.06%24.01%-2.32%

Correlation

The correlation between JPCT.DE and XDEB.DE is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.51

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 13, 2020

0.65

Over the past year, the correlation between JPCT.DE and XDEB.DE has dropped to 0.32 - well below their long-term average of 0.65, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JPCT.DE vs. XDEB.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JPCT.DE
JPCT.DE Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
JPCT.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JPCT.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
JPCT.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
JPCT.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
JPCT.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

XDEB.DE
XDEB.DE Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
XDEB.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDEB.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDEB.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
XDEB.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDEB.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JPCT.DE vs. XDEB.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Carbon Transition Global Equity UCITS ETF USD (acc) (JPCT.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1C (XDEB.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JPCT.DEXDEB.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.60

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.00

+0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.11

-0.02

+2.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.45

-0.03

+8.48

JPCT.DE vs. XDEB.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JPCT.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.59, which is higher than the XDEB.DE Sharpe Ratio of -0.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JPCT.DE and XDEB.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JPCT.DEXDEB.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.59

-0.01

+1.60

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

0.61

+0.20

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.96

0.70

+0.26

Drawdowns

JPCT.DE vs. XDEB.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JPCT.DE drawdown since its inception was -22.18%, smaller than the maximum XDEB.DE drawdown of -28.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JPCT.DE and XDEB.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JPCT.DEXDEB.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.18%

-28.57%

+6.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.78%

-5.31%

-3.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.18%

-13.02%

-9.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.18%

-13.02%

-9.16%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.17%

-6.53%

+6.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.13%

-5.03%

+0.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.20%

2.37%

-0.17%

Volatility

JPCT.DE vs. XDEB.DE - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan Carbon Transition Global Equity UCITS ETF USD (acc) (JPCT.DE) has a higher volatility of 2.80% compared to Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1C (XDEB.DE) at 2.63%. This indicates that JPCT.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XDEB.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JPCT.DEXDEB.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.80%

2.63%

+0.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.42%

5.56%

+2.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.67%

7.86%

+3.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.13%

10.16%

+3.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.89%

12.03%

+1.86%

JPCT.DE vs. XDEB.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

JPCT.DE has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than XDEB.DE's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

JPCT.DE vs. XDEB.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither JPCT.DE nor XDEB.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


JPCT.DE and XDEB.DE have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, JPCT.DE is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

JPCT.DE is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XDEB.DE.

JPCT.DE tracks Solactive JP Morgan Asset Management Carbon Transition Global Equity, while XDEB.DE tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and DWS. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for JPCT.DE and 0.25% for XDEB.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JPCT.DE and XDEB.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer