PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JPAS.L vs. JPLG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JPAS.L vs. JPLG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in JPMorgan ETFs (Ireland) ICAV - USD Ultra-Short Income Active ETF USD Acc (JPAS.L) and JPMorgan Global Equity Multi-Factor UCITS ETF Accumulating (JPLG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

JPAS.L is traded in GBP, while JPLG.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the JPLG.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JPAS.L achieves a 1.52% return, which is significantly lower than JPLG.L's 11.63% return.


JPAS.L

1D
-0.62%
1M
-0.14%
6M
1.35%
YTD
1.52%
1Y
3.51%
3Y*
4.11%
5Y*
4.11%
10Y*

JPLG.L

1D
-0.96%
1M
-0.36%
6M
9.08%
YTD
11.63%
1Y
20.46%
3Y*
14.27%
5Y*
10.14%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JPAS.L vs. JPLG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
JPAS.L
JPMorgan ETFs (Ireland) ICAV - USD Ultra-Short Income Active ETF USD Acc
1.52%-2.07%7.27%-0.71%13.13%1.38%-1.17%-3.95%
JPLG.L
JPMorgan Global Equity Multi-Factor UCITS ETF Accumulating
11.63%10.11%12.09%7.05%0.72%24.67%2.57%-0.44%

Correlation

The correlation between JPAS.L and JPLG.L is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.17

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2019

0.12

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JPAS.L vs. JPLG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JPAS.L
JPAS.L Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
JPAS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JPAS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
JPAS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
JPAS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
JPAS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

JPLG.L
JPLG.L Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
JPLG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JPLG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
JPLG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
JPLG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
JPLG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JPAS.L vs. JPLG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan ETFs (Ireland) ICAV - USD Ultra-Short Income Active ETF USD Acc (JPAS.L) and JPMorgan Global Equity Multi-Factor UCITS ETF Accumulating (JPLG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JPAS.LJPLG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.63

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.45

-0.36

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.80

3.65

-2.84

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.05

13.44

-11.39

JPAS.L vs. JPLG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JPAS.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.55, which is lower than the JPLG.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JPAS.L and JPLG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JPAS.L vs. JPLG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JPAS.L drawdown since its inception was -26.18%, roughly equal to the maximum JPLG.L drawdown of -27.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JPAS.L and JPLG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JPAS.LJPLG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.18%

-27.53%

+1.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.36%

-5.59%

+1.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.32%

-13.65%

+4.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.31%

-13.65%

-1.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.97%

-1.95%

-5.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.97%

-3.25%

-11.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.71%

1.52%

+0.19%

Volatility

JPAS.L vs. JPLG.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JPMorgan ETFs (Ireland) ICAV - USD Ultra-Short Income Active ETF USD Acc (JPAS.L) is 1.77%, while JPMorgan Global Equity Multi-Factor UCITS ETF Accumulating (JPLG.L) has a volatility of 2.28%. This indicates that JPAS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JPLG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JPAS.LJPLG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.77%

2.28%

-0.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.71%

6.13%

-1.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.37%

8.01%

-1.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.32%

10.91%

-2.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.24%

13.67%

-1.43%

JPAS.L vs. JPLG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

JPAS.L has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than JPLG.L's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

JPAS.L vs. JPLG.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither JPAS.L nor JPLG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


JPAS.L and JPLG.L have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, JPAS.L is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

JPAS.L is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for JPLG.L.

JPAS.L is categorized as Dividend, while JPLG.L is Global Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for JPAS.L and 0.20% for JPLG.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JPAS.L and JPLG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer