JOPPX vs. LLSCX

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

JOPPX (Johnson Opportunity Fund) and LLSCX (Longleaf Partners Small-Cap Fund) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, JOPPX returned 9.34%/yr vs 5.59%/yr for LLSCX. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. JOPPX charges 1.00%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for LLSCX.

Performance

JOPPX vs. LLSCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Johnson Opportunity Fund (JOPPX) and Longleaf Partners Small-Cap Fund (LLSCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JOPPX achieves a 10.11% return, which is significantly higher than LLSCX's -5.84% return. Over the past 10 years, JOPPX has outperformed LLSCX with an annualized return of 9.34%, while LLSCX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.59% annualized return.

JOPPX

• 1D: 0.34%
• 1M: 2.34%
• 6M: 4.92%
• YTD: 10.11%
• 1Y: 12.85%
• 3Y*: 9.00%
• 5Y*: 6.02%
• 10Y*: 9.34%

LLSCX

• 1D: 0.70%
• 1M: -2.21%
• 6M: -8.79%
• YTD: -5.84%
• 1Y: -5.62%
• 3Y*: 6.22%
• 5Y*: 0.96%
• 10Y*: 5.59%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JOPPX vs. LLSCX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
JOPPX Johnson Opportunity Fund	10.11%	4.13%	3.97%	17.12%	-12.39%	30.51%	7.85%	28.63%	-14.16%	16.95%
LLSCX Longleaf Partners Small-Cap Fund	-5.84%	7.56%	9.69%	20.17%	-19.25%	11.18%	4.17%	27.74%	-6.52%	9.07%

Correlation

The correlation between JOPPX and LLSCX is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.73
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.79
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.83
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.80
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 1995	0.76

The correlation between JOPPX and LLSCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

JOPPX vs. LLSCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JOPPX

JOPPX Risk / Return Rank: 18
JOPPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 15
JOPPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 18
JOPPX Omega Ratio Rank: 15
JOPPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 19
JOPPX Martin Ratio Rank: 21

LLSCX

LLSCX Risk / Return Rank: 1
LLSCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
LLSCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
LLSCX Omega Ratio Rank: 1
LLSCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
LLSCX Martin Ratio Rank: 1

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JOPPX vs. LLSCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Johnson Opportunity Fund (JOPPX) and Longleaf Partners Small-Cap Fund (LLSCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	JOPPX	LLSCX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.80	-0.46	+1.26
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.31	-0.56	+1.87
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.15	0.94	+0.21
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.17	-0.52	+1.69
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.73	-1.10	+4.82

JOPPX vs. LLSCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JOPPX Sharpe Ratio is 0.80, which is higher than the LLSCX Sharpe Ratio of -0.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JOPPX and LLSCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

JOPPX vs. LLSCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JOPPX drawdown since its inception was -71.27%, which is greater than LLSCX's maximum drawdown of -63.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JOPPX and LLSCX.

Drawdown Indicators

	JOPPX	LLSCX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-71.27%	-63.97%	-7.30%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.82%	-11.44%	+1.62%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-25.88%	-15.40%	-10.48%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.88%	-26.67%	+0.79%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-38.28%	-42.23%	+3.95%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.20%	-9.99%	+8.79%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.44%	-8.90%	-5.54%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.09%	5.46%	-2.37%

Volatility

JOPPX vs. LLSCX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Johnson Opportunity Fund (JOPPX) is 4.03%, while Longleaf Partners Small-Cap Fund (LLSCX) has a volatility of 4.80%. This indicates that JOPPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LLSCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JOPPX	LLSCX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.03%	4.80%	-0.77%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.22%	9.47%	+0.75%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.30%	13.11%	+1.19%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.74%	16.99%	+0.75%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.13%	24.55%	-5.42%

JOPPX vs. LLSCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JOPPX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than LLSCX's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

JOPPX vs. LLSCX - Dividend Comparison

JOPPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.45%, more than LLSCX's 1.25% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
JOPPX Johnson Opportunity Fund	4.45%	4.90%	0.00%	3.67%	4.36%	13.04%	0.57%	4.36%	6.75%	10.55%	2.03%	9.61%
LLSCX Longleaf Partners Small-Cap Fund	1.25%	1.17%	0.11%	0.94%	1.20%	0.82%	5.85%	14.89%	18.13%	8.43%	18.01%	5.91%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JOPPX and LLSCX in my portfolio?

JOPPX and LLSCX have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, JOPPX or LLSCX?

LLSCX has higher volatility (4.80%) compared to JOPPX (4.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JOPPX dropped -71.27% vs LLSCX's -63.97%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

JOPPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.80 vs -0.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.