JNVSX vs. DSMFX
JNVSX (Jensen Quality Value Fund) and DSMFX (Destinations Small-Mid Cap Equity Fund) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, JNVSX returned 8.08%/yr vs 8.06%/yr for DSMFX. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. JNVSX charges 1.05%/yr vs 1.10%/yr for DSMFX.
Performance
JNVSX vs. DSMFX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JNVSX achieves a -1.11% return, which is significantly lower than DSMFX's 20.41% return.
JNVSX
- 1D
- 1.50%
- 1M
- -0.32%
- YTD
- -1.11%
- 6M
- -2.18%
- 1Y
- -2.31%
- 3Y*
- 4.99%
- 5Y*
- 8.08%
- 10Y*
- 11.17%
DSMFX
- 1D
- 0.29%
- 1M
- 1.41%
- YTD
- 20.41%
- 6M
- 17.61%
- 1Y
- 41.07%
- 3Y*
- 19.71%
- 5Y*
- 8.06%
- 10Y*
- —
JNVSX vs. DSMFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JNVSX Jensen Quality Value Fund | -1.11% | -2.58% | 9.40% | 18.58% | -15.83% | 60.71% | 14.79% | 27.58% | -9.03% | 12.63% |
DSMFX Destinations Small-Mid Cap Equity Fund | 20.41% | 13.94% | 14.72% | 11.61% | -19.89% | 26.65% | 23.63% | 30.82% | -7.68% | 12.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between JNVSX and DSMFX is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 20, 2017 | 0.81 |
Over the past year, the correlation between JNVSX and DSMFX has dropped to 0.49 - well below their long-term average of 0.81, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JNVSX vs. DSMFX — Risk / Return Rank
JNVSX
DSMFX
JNVSX vs. DSMFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Jensen Quality Value Fund (JNVSX) and Destinations Small-Mid Cap Equity Fund (DSMFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| JNVSX | DSMFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.49 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.35 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | 1.38 | -0.41 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.31 | 4.21 | -4.52 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.59 | 16.54 | -17.13 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
JNVSX vs. DSMFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JNVSX drawdown since its inception was -34.52%, smaller than the maximum DSMFX drawdown of -42.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JNVSX and DSMFX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JNVSX | DSMFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.52% | -42.52% | +8.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.42% | -9.75% | -0.67% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.43% | -27.39% | +9.96% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.56% | -30.72% | +6.16% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.52% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.54% | -1.32% | -8.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.19% | -8.71% | +3.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.56% | 2.45% | +3.11% |
Volatility
JNVSX vs. DSMFX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Jensen Quality Value Fund (JNVSX) is 3.47%, while Destinations Small-Mid Cap Equity Fund (DSMFX) has a volatility of 6.66%. This indicates that JNVSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DSMFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JNVSX | DSMFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.47% | 6.66% | -3.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.53% | 14.27% | -4.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.85% | 18.38% | -5.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.48% | 21.08% | -0.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.23% | 21.88% | -2.65% |
JNVSX vs. DSMFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
JNVSX has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is lower than DSMFX's 1.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
JNVSX vs. DSMFX - Dividend Comparison
JNVSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.38%, more than DSMFX's 5.93% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DSMFX Destinations Small-Mid Cap Equity Fund | 5.93% | 7.13% | 7.71% | 0.26% | 3.57% | 27.39% | 2.06% | 4.05% | 5.96% | 0.92% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
JNVSX Jensen Quality Value Fund | 11.38% | 11.31% | 6.15% | 0.56% | 2.69% | 22.40% | 1.27% | 5.13% | 6.15% | 4.14% | 1.34% | 17.62% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JNVSX and DSMFX have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DSMFX has higher volatility (6.66%) compared to JNVSX (3.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JNVSX dropped -34.52% vs DSMFX's -42.52%.
DSMFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs -0.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JNVSX and DSMFX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer