PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DSMFX vs. FMCDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DSMFX vs. FMCDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Destinations Small-Mid Cap Equity Fund (DSMFX) and Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Mid Cap Fund Class A (FMCDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with DSMFX having a 20.55% return and FMCDX slightly higher at 21.09%.


DSMFX

1D
1.71%
1M
3.42%
YTD
20.55%
6M
17.59%
1Y
42.99%
3Y*
18.91%
5Y*
9.00%
10Y*

FMCDX

1D
1.52%
1M
5.29%
YTD
21.09%
6M
18.57%
1Y
33.53%
3Y*
16.36%
5Y*
9.20%
10Y*
12.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DSMFX vs. FMCDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DSMFX
Destinations Small-Mid Cap Equity Fund
20.55%13.94%14.72%11.61%-19.89%26.65%23.63%30.82%-7.68%12.35%
FMCDX
Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Mid Cap Fund Class A
21.09%10.17%8.89%16.86%-14.11%22.92%12.77%29.26%-7.82%11.62%

Correlation

The correlation between DSMFX and FMCDX is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 20, 2017

0.93

The correlation between DSMFX and FMCDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DSMFX vs. FMCDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DSMFX
DSMFX Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
DSMFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DSMFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
DSMFX Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
DSMFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
DSMFX Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

FMCDX
FMCDX Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
FMCDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FMCDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
FMCDX Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
FMCDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
FMCDX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DSMFX vs. FMCDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Destinations Small-Mid Cap Equity Fund (DSMFX) and Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Mid Cap Fund Class A (FMCDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DSMFXFMCDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.36

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.56

3.88

+0.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.94

14.41

+3.53

DSMFX vs. FMCDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DSMFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.43, which is comparable to the FMCDX Sharpe Ratio of 2.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DSMFX and FMCDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DSMFX vs. FMCDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DSMFX drawdown since its inception was -42.52%, smaller than the maximum FMCDX drawdown of -65.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DSMFX and FMCDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DSMFXFMCDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.52%

-65.00%

+22.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.75%

-8.70%

-1.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.39%

-25.19%

-2.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.72%

-25.19%

-5.53%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.72%

-10.62%

+1.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.45%

2.34%

+0.11%

Volatility

DSMFX vs. FMCDX - Volatility Comparison

Destinations Small-Mid Cap Equity Fund (DSMFX) has a higher volatility of 6.68% compared to Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Mid Cap Fund Class A (FMCDX) at 5.38%. This indicates that DSMFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FMCDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DSMFXFMCDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.68%

5.38%

+1.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.42%

12.74%

+1.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.28%

16.50%

+1.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.08%

20.07%

+1.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.88%

21.03%

+0.85%

DSMFX vs. FMCDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DSMFX has a 1.10% expense ratio, which is higher than FMCDX's 1.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

DSMFX vs. FMCDX - Dividend Comparison

DSMFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.92%, less than FMCDX's 7.08% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DSMFX
Destinations Small-Mid Cap Equity Fund
5.92%7.13%7.71%0.26%3.57%27.39%2.06%4.05%5.96%0.92%0.00%0.00%
FMCDX
Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Mid Cap Fund Class A
7.08%8.58%0.00%0.61%10.14%13.43%2.25%4.16%21.85%4.30%1.03%9.17%

Frequently Asked Questions


DSMFX and FMCDX have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DSMFX has higher volatility (6.68%) compared to FMCDX (5.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DSMFX dropped -42.52% vs FMCDX's -65.00%.

DSMFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs 2.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DSMFX and FMCDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer