PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DSMFX vs. FMCDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DSMFX vs. FMCDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Destinations Small-Mid Cap Equity Fund (DSMFX) and Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Mid Cap Fund Class A (FMCDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DSMFX achieves a 15.86% return, which is significantly lower than FMCDX's 18.46% return.


DSMFX

1D
1.47%
1M
-3.21%
6M
9.15%
YTD
15.86%
1Y
32.51%
3Y*
15.49%
5Y*
7.75%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
11.95%

FMCDX

1D
1.24%
1M
-2.13%
6M
13.40%
YTD
18.46%
1Y
27.22%
3Y*
13.37%
5Y*
8.50%
10Y*
11.57%
ALL TIME*
10.51%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

DSMFX vs. FMCDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DSMFX
Destinations Small-Mid Cap Equity Fund
15.86%13.94%14.72%11.61%-19.89%26.65%23.63%30.82%-7.68%12.35%
FMCDX
Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Mid Cap Fund Class A
18.46%10.17%8.89%16.86%-14.11%22.92%12.77%29.26%-7.82%11.62%

Correlation

The correlation between DSMFX and FMCDX is 0.86, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 20, 2017

0.93

The correlation between DSMFX and FMCDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DSMFX vs. FMCDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DSMFX
DSMFX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
DSMFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DSMFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
DSMFX Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
DSMFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
DSMFX Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

FMCDX
FMCDX Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
FMCDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FMCDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
FMCDX Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
FMCDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
FMCDX Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DSMFX vs. FMCDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Destinations Small-Mid Cap Equity Fund (DSMFX) and Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Mid Cap Fund Class A (FMCDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DSMFXFMCDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.25

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.16

2.73

+0.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.18

10.06

+1.13

DSMFX vs. FMCDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DSMFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.66, which is comparable to the FMCDX Sharpe Ratio of 1.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DSMFX and FMCDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DSMFX vs. FMCDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DSMFX drawdown since its inception was -42.52%, smaller than the maximum FMCDX drawdown of -65.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DSMFX and FMCDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DSMFXFMCDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.52%

-65.00%

+22.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.75%

-8.70%

-1.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.39%

-25.19%

-2.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.72%

-25.19%

-5.53%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.80%

-3.63%

-2.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.66%

-10.59%

+1.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.72%

2.39%

+0.33%

Volatility

DSMFX vs. FMCDX - Volatility Comparison

Destinations Small-Mid Cap Equity Fund (DSMFX) and Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Mid Cap Fund Class A (FMCDX) have volatilities of 4.23% and 4.09%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DSMFXFMCDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.23%

4.09%

+0.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.28%

12.84%

+1.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.58%

16.71%

+1.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.03%

20.00%

+1.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.82%

20.97%

+0.85%

DSMFX vs. FMCDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DSMFX has a 1.10% expense ratio, which is higher than FMCDX's 1.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

DSMFX vs. FMCDX - Dividend Comparison

DSMFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.16%, less than FMCDX's 7.24% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DSMFX
Destinations Small-Mid Cap Equity Fund
6.16%7.13%7.71%0.26%3.57%27.39%2.06%4.05%5.96%0.92%0.00%0.00%
FMCDX
Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Mid Cap Fund Class A
7.24%8.58%0.00%0.61%10.14%13.43%2.25%4.16%21.85%4.30%1.03%9.17%

Frequently Asked Questions


DSMFX and FMCDX have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DSMFX has higher volatility (4.23%) compared to FMCDX (4.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DSMFX dropped -42.52% vs FMCDX's -65.00%.

DSMFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.66 vs 1.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DSMFX and FMCDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer