PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JNVSX vs. BRMKX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JNVSX vs. BRMKX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Jensen Quality Value Fund (JNVSX) and iShares Russell Mid-Cap Index Fund (BRMKX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JNVSX achieves a 4.50% return, which is significantly lower than BRMKX's 16.14% return. Over the past 10 years, JNVSX has underperformed BRMKX with an annualized return of 10.80%, while BRMKX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.53% annualized return.


JNVSX

1D
0.82%
1M
2.51%
6M
4.18%
YTD
4.50%
1Y
0.72%
3Y*
5.80%
5Y*
8.58%
10Y*
10.80%
ALL TIME*
10.50%

BRMKX

1D
1.30%
1M
0.64%
6M
12.02%
YTD
16.14%
1Y
20.18%
3Y*
16.20%
5Y*
8.50%
10Y*
11.53%
ALL TIME*
12.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

JNVSX vs. BRMKX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JNVSX
Jensen Quality Value Fund
4.50%-2.58%9.40%18.58%-15.83%60.71%14.79%27.58%-9.03%15.08%
BRMKX
iShares Russell Mid-Cap Index Fund
16.14%10.48%15.28%17.30%-17.22%22.52%17.17%30.47%-9.09%17.74%

Correlation

The correlation between JNVSX and BRMKX is 0.67, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.87

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016

0.89

Over the past year, the correlation between JNVSX and BRMKX has dropped to 0.67 - well below their long-term average of 0.89, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JNVSX vs. BRMKX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

JNVSX
JNVSX Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
JNVSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JNVSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
JNVSX Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
JNVSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
JNVSX Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

BRMKX
BRMKX Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
BRMKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BRMKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
BRMKX Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
BRMKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
BRMKX Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

JNVSX vs. BRMKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Jensen Quality Value Fund (JNVSX) and iShares Russell Mid-Cap Index Fund (BRMKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JNVSXBRMKXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.93

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

1.28

-0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.26

2.69

-2.43

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.46

10.45

-9.99

JNVSX vs. BRMKX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JNVSX Sharpe Ratio is 0.20, which is lower than the BRMKX Sharpe Ratio of 1.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JNVSX and BRMKX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JNVSX vs. BRMKX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JNVSX drawdown since its inception was -34.52%, smaller than the maximum BRMKX drawdown of -40.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JNVSX and BRMKX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JNVSXBRMKXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.52%

-40.20%

+5.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.42%

-8.17%

-2.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.43%

-21.07%

+3.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.56%

-26.04%

+1.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.52%

-40.20%

+5.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.42%

0.00%

-4.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.20%

-5.57%

+0.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.81%

2.10%

+3.71%

Volatility

JNVSX vs. BRMKX - Volatility Comparison

Jensen Quality Value Fund (JNVSX) has a higher volatility of 5.26% compared to iShares Russell Mid-Cap Index Fund (BRMKX) at 2.78%. This indicates that JNVSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BRMKX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JNVSXBRMKXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.26%

2.78%

+2.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.32%

10.25%

+0.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.51%

13.71%

-0.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.56%

18.26%

+2.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.22%

19.27%

-0.05%

JNVSX vs. BRMKX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JNVSX has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than BRMKX's 0.06% expense ratio.


Dividends

JNVSX vs. BRMKX - Dividend Comparison

JNVSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.77%, more than BRMKX's 5.15% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BRMKX
iShares Russell Mid-Cap Index Fund
5.15%5.92%6.43%3.02%3.67%4.07%2.86%3.95%3.87%19.24%2.11%0.00%
JNVSX
Jensen Quality Value Fund
10.77%11.31%6.15%0.56%2.69%22.40%1.27%5.13%6.15%4.14%1.34%17.62%

Frequently Asked Questions


JNVSX and BRMKX have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JNVSX has higher volatility (5.26%) compared to BRMKX (2.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JNVSX dropped -34.52% vs BRMKX's -40.20%.

BRMKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.61 vs 0.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JNVSX and BRMKX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer