PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BRMKX vs. WFSPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BRMKX vs. WFSPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Russell Mid-Cap Index Fund (BRMKX) and iShares S&P 500 Index Fund Class K (WFSPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BRMKX achieves a 14.65% return, which is significantly higher than WFSPX's 10.11% return. Over the past 10 years, BRMKX has underperformed WFSPX with an annualized return of 11.53%, while WFSPX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.03% annualized return.


BRMKX

1D
-0.28%
1M
-0.65%
6M
10.51%
YTD
14.65%
1Y
20.31%
3Y*
14.89%
5Y*
8.21%
10Y*
11.53%
ALL TIME*
11.88%

WFSPX

1D
0.71%
1M
0.14%
6M
7.96%
YTD
10.11%
1Y
21.43%
3Y*
19.37%
5Y*
12.81%
10Y*
15.03%
ALL TIME*
16.27%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

BRMKX vs. WFSPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BRMKX
iShares Russell Mid-Cap Index Fund
14.65%10.48%15.28%17.30%-17.22%22.52%17.17%30.47%-9.09%17.74%
WFSPX
iShares S&P 500 Index Fund Class K
10.11%17.83%24.94%26.25%-18.14%28.63%18.43%31.45%-4.83%21.27%

Correlation

The correlation between BRMKX and WFSPX is 0.76, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.76

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.88

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016

0.90

The correlation between BRMKX and WFSPX shifts across timeframes, from 0.76 (1 year) to 0.90 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BRMKX vs. WFSPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BRMKX
BRMKX Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
BRMKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BRMKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
BRMKX Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
BRMKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
BRMKX Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

WFSPX
WFSPX Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
WFSPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WFSPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
WFSPX Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
WFSPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
WFSPX Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BRMKX vs. WFSPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell Mid-Cap Index Fund (BRMKX) and iShares S&P 500 Index Fund Class K (WFSPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BRMKXWFSPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.27

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.30

2.20

+0.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.93

9.44

-0.51

BRMKX vs. WFSPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BRMKX Sharpe Ratio is 1.37, which is comparable to the WFSPX Sharpe Ratio of 1.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BRMKX and WFSPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BRMKX vs. WFSPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BRMKX drawdown since its inception was -40.20%, smaller than the maximum WFSPX drawdown of -58.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BRMKX and WFSPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BRMKXWFSPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.20%

-58.21%

+18.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.17%

-8.90%

+0.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.07%

-18.74%

-2.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.04%

-24.51%

-1.53%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.20%

-33.74%

-6.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.95%

-1.41%

+0.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.58%

-12.72%

+7.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.10%

2.07%

+0.03%

Volatility

BRMKX vs. WFSPX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Russell Mid-Cap Index Fund (BRMKX) is 2.45%, while iShares S&P 500 Index Fund Class K (WFSPX) has a volatility of 3.52%. This indicates that BRMKX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WFSPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BRMKXWFSPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.45%

3.52%

-1.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.22%

10.11%

+0.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.72%

12.86%

+0.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.24%

16.99%

+1.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.26%

18.03%

+1.23%

BRMKX vs. WFSPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BRMKX has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is higher than WFSPX's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

BRMKX vs. WFSPX - Dividend Comparison

BRMKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.21%, more than WFSPX's 1.66% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BRMKX
iShares Russell Mid-Cap Index Fund
5.21%5.92%6.43%3.02%3.67%4.07%2.86%3.95%3.87%19.24%2.11%0.00%
WFSPX
iShares S&P 500 Index Fund Class K
1.66%1.72%1.41%1.50%2.02%1.82%1.66%1.99%2.00%1.62%2.37%2.49%

Frequently Asked Questions


BRMKX and WFSPX have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WFSPX has higher volatility (3.52%) compared to BRMKX (2.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BRMKX dropped -40.20% vs WFSPX's -58.21%.

WFSPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.52 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BRMKX and WFSPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer