JNUG vs. MULL

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

JNUG (Direxion Daily Junior Gold Miners Index Bull 2x Shares) and MULL (GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. JNUG is passively managed, while MULL is actively managed. Over the past year, JNUG returned 112.06% vs 6388.53% for MULL. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. JNUG charges 1.17%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for MULL.

Performance

JNUG vs. MULL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily Junior Gold Miners Index Bull 2x Shares (JNUG) and GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF (MULL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JNUG achieves a -13.94% return, which is significantly lower than MULL's 907.48% return.

JNUG

• 1D: 1.51%
• 1M: -2.04%
• YTD: -13.94%
• 6M: -0.62%
• 1Y: 112.06%
• 3Y*: 71.84%
• 5Y*: 12.42%
• 10Y*: -23.85%

MULL

• 1D: 5.57%
• 1M: 246.94%
• YTD: 907.48%
• 6M: 1,268.17%
• 1Y: 6,388.53%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JNUG vs. MULL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
JNUG Direxion Daily Junior Gold Miners Index Bull 2x Shares	-13.94%	478.59%	-11.61%
MULL GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF	907.48%	558.51%	-40.10%

Correlation

The correlation between JNUG and MULL is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.21
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 13, 2024	0.20

JNUG vs. MULL - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	JNUG	MULL
Basic Materials	100.0%	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	66.7%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

JNUG vs. MULL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JNUG

JNUG Risk / Return Rank: 37
JNUG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 32
JNUG Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
JNUG Omega Ratio Rank: 37
JNUG Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
JNUG Martin Ratio Rank: 36

MULL

MULL Risk / Return Rank: 99
MULL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
MULL Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
MULL Omega Ratio Rank: 97
MULL Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
MULL Martin Ratio Rank: 100

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JNUG vs. MULL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Junior Gold Miners Index Bull 2x Shares (JNUG) and GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF (MULL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	JNUG	MULL	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.14	49.08	-47.94
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.76	7.09	-5.33
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.90	-0.65
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.45	130.56	-128.11
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	5.48	439.01	-433.54
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

JNUG vs. MULL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JNUG Sharpe Ratio is 1.14, which is lower than the MULL Sharpe Ratio of 49.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JNUG and MULL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	JNUG	MULL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.14	49.08	-47.94
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.16	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.22	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.29	7.34	-7.63

Drawdowns

JNUG vs. MULL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JNUG drawdown since its inception was -99.95%, which is greater than MULL's maximum drawdown of -72.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JNUG and MULL.

Drawdown Indicators

	JNUG	MULL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.95%	-72.29%	-27.66%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-56.39%	-53.09%	-3.30%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-56.39%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-80.95%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-99.66%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-99.52%	0.00%	-99.52%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-93.89%	-20.67%	-73.22%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	25.28%	15.79%	+9.49%

Volatility

JNUG vs. MULL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Direxion Daily Junior Gold Miners Index Bull 2x Shares (JNUG) is 31.67%, while GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF (MULL) has a volatility of 55.71%. This indicates that JNUG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MULL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JNUG	MULL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	31.67%	55.71%	-24.04%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	83.60%	105.59%	-21.99%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	99.37%	132.53%	-33.16%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	80.40%	136.39%	-55.99%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	106.52%	136.39%	-29.87%

JNUG vs. MULL - Expense Ratio Comparison

JNUG has a 1.17% expense ratio, which is lower than MULL's 1.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

JNUG vs. MULL - Dividend Comparison

JNUG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.43%, more than MULL's 0.04% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
JNUG Direxion Daily Junior Gold Miners Index Bull 2x Shares	1.43%	1.04%	2.01%	1.62%	0.00%	0.52%	0.10%	0.46%	0.06%	0.51%
MULL GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF	0.04%	0.39%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JNUG and MULL in my portfolio?

JNUG and MULL have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, JNUG or MULL?

MULL has higher volatility (55.71%) compared to JNUG (31.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JNUG dropped -99.95% vs MULL's -72.29%.

Which ETF is better, JNUG or MULL?

On 1-year performance, MULL leads with 6388.53% vs 112.06% for JNUG. On fees, JNUG is cheaper at 1.17% per year. On volatility, JNUG has been the lower-risk option at 31.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, JNUG or MULL?

Over the 1-year period, MULL has performed better with a 6388.53% return vs 112.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, JNUG or MULL?

JNUG is cheaper with a 1.17% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for MULL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, JNUG or MULL?

JNUG has the higher dividend yield at 1.43%, compared with 0.04% for MULL.

What is the main difference between JNUG and MULL?

They also come from different issuers: Direxion and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 1.17% for JNUG and 1.50% for MULL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MULL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (49.08 vs 1.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.