PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JNUG vs. GLDM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JNUG vs. GLDM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily Junior Gold Miners Index Bull 2X ETF (JNUG) and SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JNUG achieves a -45.63% return, which is significantly lower than GLDM's -6.13% return.


JNUG

1D
-7.15%
1M
-15.90%
6M
-52.25%
YTD
-45.63%
1Y
55.90%
3Y*
52.37%
5Y*
8.91%
10Y*
-32.42%
ALL TIME*
-36.14%

GLDM

1D
-1.46%
1M
-1.72%
6M
-16.53%
YTD
-6.13%
1Y
20.58%
3Y*
27.59%
5Y*
17.31%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
15.36%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$263.44M$251.25M$317.77M
$33.40M$38.00M$44.93M

JNUG vs. GLDM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
JNUG
Direxion Daily Junior Gold Miners Index Bull 2X ETF
-45.63%478.59%9.96%-4.79%-43.60%-46.61%-85.51%82.43%-31.79%
GLDM
SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust
-6.13%64.20%27.08%13.04%-0.47%-4.01%25.10%18.10%1.75%

Correlation

The correlation between JNUG and GLDM is 0.82, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2018

0.77

The correlation between JNUG and GLDM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JNUG vs. GLDM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

JNUG
JNUG Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
JNUG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JNUG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
JNUG Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
JNUG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
JNUG Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

GLDM
GLDM Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
GLDM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLDM Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLDM Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
GLDM Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLDM Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

JNUG vs. GLDM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Junior Gold Miners Index Bull 2X ETF (JNUG) and SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JNUGGLDMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.17

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.85

0.88

-0.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.67

1.90

-0.23

JNUG vs. GLDM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JNUG Sharpe Ratio is 0.56, which is lower than the GLDM Sharpe Ratio of 0.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JNUG and GLDM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JNUG vs. GLDM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JNUG drawdown since its inception was -99.95%, which is greater than GLDM's maximum drawdown of -26.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JNUG and GLDM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JNUGGLDMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.95%

-26.27%

-73.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-70.58%

-26.27%

-44.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-70.58%

-26.27%

-44.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-76.67%

-26.27%

-50.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-99.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.70%

-24.94%

-74.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-93.93%

-6.56%

-87.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

35.99%

12.12%

+23.87%

Volatility

JNUG vs. GLDM - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily Junior Gold Miners Index Bull 2X ETF (JNUG) has a higher volatility of 29.49% compared to SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM) at 6.35%. This indicates that JNUG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GLDM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JNUGGLDMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

29.49%

6.35%

+23.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

90.25%

23.37%

+66.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

107.20%

27.92%

+79.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

82.38%

18.39%

+63.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

105.73%

17.10%

+88.63%

JNUG vs. GLDM - Expense Ratio Comparison

JNUG has a 1.03% expense ratio, which is higher than GLDM's 0.10% expense ratio.


Dividends

JNUG vs. GLDM - Dividend Comparison

JNUG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.62%, while GLDM has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
GLDM
SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
JNUG
Direxion Daily Junior Gold Miners Index Bull 2X ETF
2.62%1.04%2.01%1.62%0.00%0.52%0.10%0.46%0.06%0.51%

Frequently Asked Questions


JNUG and GLDM have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JNUG has higher volatility (29.49%) compared to GLDM (6.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JNUG dropped -99.95% vs GLDM's -26.27%.

On 5-year performance, GLDM leads with 17.31% vs 8.91% for JNUG. On fees, GLDM is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, GLDM has been the lower-risk option at 6.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, GLDM has performed better with a 17.31% return vs 8.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GLDM is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 1.03% for JNUG.

JNUG has the higher dividend yield at 2.62%, compared with 0.00% for GLDM.

JNUG tracks MVIS Global Junior Gold Miners Index (200%), while GLDM tracks LBMA Gold Price PM. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and State Street. Their fees differ too: 1.03% for JNUG and 0.10% for GLDM.

GLDM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.83 vs 0.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JNUG and GLDM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer