PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JNSTX vs. JGLTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JNSTX vs. JGLTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Janus Henderson Short Duration Flexible Bond Fund (JNSTX) and Janus Henderson VIT Global Technology and Innovation Portfolio (JGLTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JNSTX achieves a 1.14% return, which is significantly lower than JGLTX's 17.82% return. Over the past 10 years, JNSTX has underperformed JGLTX with an annualized return of 2.16%, while JGLTX has yielded a comparatively higher 22.24% annualized return.


JNSTX

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.35%
6M
0.77%
YTD
1.14%
1Y
3.47%
3Y*
5.10%
5Y*
2.06%
10Y*
2.16%
ALL TIME*
1.98%

JGLTX

1D
6.78%
1M
-6.31%
6M
15.26%
YTD
17.82%
1Y
26.94%
3Y*
28.28%
5Y*
14.27%
10Y*
22.24%
ALL TIME*
8.28%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

JNSTX vs. JGLTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JNSTX
Janus Henderson Short Duration Flexible Bond Fund
1.14%5.89%5.27%4.67%-5.44%-0.09%4.81%4.09%0.90%1.28%
JGLTX
Janus Henderson VIT Global Technology and Innovation Portfolio
17.82%25.19%32.10%54.55%-36.42%18.28%50.42%45.29%1.17%45.17%

Correlation

The correlation between JNSTX and JGLTX is 0.07, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.07

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.03

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.09

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2010

0.03

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JNSTX vs. JGLTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

JNSTX
JNSTX Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
JNSTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JNSTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
JNSTX Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
JNSTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
JNSTX Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

JGLTX
JGLTX Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
JGLTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JGLTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
JGLTX Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
JGLTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
JGLTX Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

JNSTX vs. JGLTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson Short Duration Flexible Bond Fund (JNSTX) and Janus Henderson VIT Global Technology and Innovation Portfolio (JGLTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JNSTXJGLTXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.68

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.55

1.17

+0.38

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.10

1.28

+1.81

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.33

4.29

+10.04

JNSTX vs. JGLTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JNSTX Sharpe Ratio is 1.57, which is higher than the JGLTX Sharpe Ratio of 0.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JNSTX and JGLTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JNSTX vs. JGLTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JNSTX drawdown since its inception was -8.11%, smaller than the maximum JGLTX drawdown of -81.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JNSTX and JGLTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JNSTXJGLTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.11%

-81.78%

+73.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.37%

-18.76%

+17.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.37%

-23.72%

+22.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-8.01%

-45.18%

+37.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-8.11%

-45.18%

+37.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.35%

-13.26%

+12.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.91%

-36.42%

+35.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.30%

5.61%

-5.31%

Volatility

JNSTX vs. JGLTX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Janus Henderson Short Duration Flexible Bond Fund (JNSTX) is 0.61%, while Janus Henderson VIT Global Technology and Innovation Portfolio (JGLTX) has a volatility of 12.57%. This indicates that JNSTX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JGLTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JNSTXJGLTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.61%

12.57%

-11.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.02%

23.74%

-21.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.70%

26.93%

-24.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.22%

27.21%

-23.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.78%

25.02%

-22.24%

JNSTX vs. JGLTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JNSTX has a 0.53% expense ratio, which is lower than JGLTX's 0.72% expense ratio.


Dividends

JNSTX vs. JGLTX - Dividend Comparison

JNSTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.48%, less than JGLTX's 11.92% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JGLTX
Janus Henderson VIT Global Technology and Innovation Portfolio
11.92%8.98%0.00%0.00%26.96%14.48%7.71%6.81%4.95%5.68%3.71%16.11%
JNSTX
Janus Henderson Short Duration Flexible Bond Fund
4.48%4.65%4.76%3.12%1.92%1.55%2.05%2.33%2.24%1.61%1.24%1.30%

Frequently Asked Questions


JNSTX and JGLTX have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JGLTX has higher volatility (12.57%) compared to JNSTX (0.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JNSTX dropped -8.11% vs JGLTX's -81.78%.

JNSTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.57 vs 0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JNSTX and JGLTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer