PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JNKS.L vs. HYEA.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JNKS.L vs. HYEA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in SPDR Bloomberg SASB U.S. High Yield Corporate ESG UCITS ETF Dist USD (JNKS.L) and iShares Global High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (HYEA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

JNKS.L is traded in GBP, while HYEA.L is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the HYEA.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JNKS.L achieves a 1.56% return, which is significantly higher than HYEA.L's 1.00% return.


JNKS.L

1D
0.26%
1M
1.60%
YTD
1.56%
6M
1.26%
1Y
7.49%
3Y*
6.17%
5Y*
5.27%
10Y*
5.75%

HYEA.L

1D
0.16%
1M
1.14%
YTD
1.00%
6M
0.98%
1Y
7.10%
3Y*
6.25%
5Y*
4.10%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JNKS.L vs. HYEA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JNKS.L
SPDR Bloomberg SASB U.S. High Yield Corporate ESG UCITS ETF Dist USD
1.56%0.31%11.61%6.25%0.20%6.02%1.64%6.18%5.43%-3.10%
HYEA.L
iShares Global High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF
1.00%6.97%4.26%7.03%-1.62%1.84%3.80%7.67%1.71%-2.70%

Correlation

The correlation between JNKS.L and HYEA.L is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.67

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 25, 2017

0.73

The correlation between JNKS.L and HYEA.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.58 (1 year) to 0.73 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JNKS.L vs. HYEA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JNKS.L
JNKS.L Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
JNKS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JNKS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
JNKS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
JNKS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
JNKS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

HYEA.L
HYEA.L Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
HYEA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYEA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYEA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
HYEA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYEA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JNKS.L vs. HYEA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Bloomberg SASB U.S. High Yield Corporate ESG UCITS ETF Dist USD (JNKS.L) and iShares Global High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (HYEA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JNKS.LHYEA.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.55

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.30

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.98

3.10

-1.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.20

8.60

-3.40

JNKS.L vs. HYEA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JNKS.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.25, which is comparable to the HYEA.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JNKS.L and HYEA.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JNKS.LHYEA.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.25

1.60

-0.34

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

0.63

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.64

0.43

+0.21

Drawdowns

JNKS.L vs. HYEA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JNKS.L drawdown since its inception was -14.18%, smaller than the maximum HYEA.L drawdown of -16.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JNKS.L and HYEA.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JNKS.LHYEA.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.18%

-16.98%

+2.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.78%

-2.28%

-1.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.35%

-4.27%

-6.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-10.35%

-9.31%

-1.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-14.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.74%

-0.21%

-1.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.66%

-2.62%

-1.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.44%

0.82%

+0.62%

Volatility

JNKS.L vs. HYEA.L - Volatility Comparison

SPDR Bloomberg SASB U.S. High Yield Corporate ESG UCITS ETF Dist USD (JNKS.L) has a higher volatility of 1.55% compared to iShares Global High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (HYEA.L) at 1.47%. This indicates that JNKS.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HYEA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JNKS.LHYEA.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.55%

1.47%

+0.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.27%

3.30%

+0.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.95%

4.43%

+1.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.81%

6.47%

+1.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.29%

8.00%

+1.29%

JNKS.L vs. HYEA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

JNKS.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than HYEA.L's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

JNKS.L vs. HYEA.L - Dividend Comparison

JNKS.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.20%, while HYEA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HYEA.L
iShares Global High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
JNKS.L
SPDR Bloomberg SASB U.S. High Yield Corporate ESG UCITS ETF Dist USD
7.20%7.46%7.06%6.78%5.43%5.30%5.84%5.85%4.96%6.39%4.98%5.29%

Frequently Asked Questions


JNKS.L and HYEA.L have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, JNKS.L is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

JNKS.L is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for HYEA.L.

JNKS.L tracks Bloomberg US Corporate High Yield TR USD, while HYEA.L tracks ICE BofA Gbl HY Constnd TR USD. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for JNKS.L and 0.50% for HYEA.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JNKS.L and HYEA.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer