PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JNK vs. XLK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JNK vs. XLK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Barclays High Yield Bond ETF (JNK) and State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JNK achieves a 1.51% return, which is significantly lower than XLK's 36.47% return. Over the past 10 years, JNK has underperformed XLK with an annualized return of 5.01%, while XLK has yielded a comparatively higher 25.84% annualized return.


JNK

1D
-0.22%
1M
0.44%
YTD
1.51%
6M
1.97%
1Y
7.24%
3Y*
8.63%
5Y*
3.68%
10Y*
5.01%

XLK

1D
-1.00%
1M
21.09%
YTD
36.47%
6M
35.71%
1Y
66.93%
3Y*
33.90%
5Y*
23.83%
10Y*
25.84%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JNK vs. XLK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JNK
SPDR Barclays High Yield Bond ETF
1.51%8.76%7.71%12.42%-12.19%4.00%4.95%14.88%-3.28%6.49%
XLK
State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF
36.47%24.61%21.63%56.02%-27.73%34.74%43.62%49.86%-1.68%34.26%

Correlation

The correlation between JNK and XLK is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.59

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.54

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 5, 2007

0.57

The correlation between JNK and XLK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.54 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.

JNK vs. XLK - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
JNK
XLK

Technology

0.0%
99.7%

Energy

0.0%
0.2%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

0.1%

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

JNK
0.0%
XLK
99.7%

Energy

JNK
0.0%
XLK
0.2%

Basic Materials

JNK

-

XLK

-

Communication Services

JNK

-

XLK

-

Consumer Cyclical

JNK

-

XLK

-

Consumer Defensive

JNK

-

XLK

-

Financial Services

JNK

-

XLK

-

Healthcare

JNK

-

XLK

-

Industrials

JNK

-

XLK
0.1%

Real Estate

JNK

-

XLK

-

Utilities

JNK

-

XLK

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JNK vs. XLK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JNK
JNK Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
JNK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JNK Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
JNK Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
JNK Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
JNK Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

XLK
XLK Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
XLK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLK Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLK Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
XLK Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLK Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JNK vs. XLK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Barclays High Yield Bond ETF (JNK) and State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JNKXLKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.52

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.90

4.22

-1.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.79

14.16

-1.37

JNK vs. XLK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JNK Sharpe Ratio is 1.90, which is lower than the XLK Sharpe Ratio of 3.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JNK and XLK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JNKXLKDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.90

3.24

-1.33

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

0.96

-0.47

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

1.06

-0.45

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

0.42

0.00

Drawdowns

JNK vs. XLK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JNK drawdown since its inception was -38.48%, smaller than the maximum XLK drawdown of -82.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JNK and XLK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JNKXLKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.48%

-82.05%

+43.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.51%

-15.92%

+13.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.02%

-25.66%

+20.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.67%

-33.56%

+16.89%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.89%

-33.56%

+10.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.26%

-1.00%

+0.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.70%

-34.96%

+31.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.57%

4.74%

-4.17%

Volatility

JNK vs. XLK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR Barclays High Yield Bond ETF (JNK) is 1.13%, while State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) has a volatility of 6.98%. This indicates that JNK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JNKXLKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.13%

6.98%

-5.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.97%

16.68%

-13.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.82%

20.82%

-17.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.54%

24.90%

-17.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.31%

24.49%

-16.18%

JNK vs. XLK - Expense Ratio Comparison

JNK has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than XLK's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

JNK vs. XLK - Dividend Comparison

JNK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.62%, more than XLK's 0.39% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JNK
SPDR Barclays High Yield Bond ETF
6.62%6.54%6.63%6.38%6.06%4.27%5.11%5.44%5.90%5.60%6.06%6.59%
XLK
State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF
0.39%0.54%0.66%0.76%1.04%0.65%0.92%1.16%1.60%1.37%1.74%1.79%

Frequently Asked Questions


JNK and XLK have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XLK has higher volatility (6.98%) compared to JNK (1.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JNK dropped -38.48% vs XLK's -82.05%.

On 10-year performance, XLK leads with 25.84% vs 5.01% for JNK. On fees, XLK is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, JNK has been the lower-risk option at 1.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, XLK has performed better with a 25.84% return vs 5.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XLK is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for JNK.

JNK has the higher dividend yield at 6.62%, compared with 0.39% for XLK.

JNK is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while XLK is Technology Equities. JNK tracks Barclays Capital High Yield Very Liquid Index, while XLK tracks S&P Technology Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for JNK and 0.08% for XLK.

XLK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.24 vs 1.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JNK and XLK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer