JNK vs. SPMO
JNK (State Street SPDR Bloomberg High Yield Bond ETF) and SPMO (Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - JNK is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg High Yield Very Liquid Index, while SPMO is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P 500 Momentum Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, JNK returned 5.09%/yr vs 20.86%/yr for SPMO. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. JNK charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for SPMO.
Performance
JNK vs. SPMO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JNK achieves a 1.83% return, which is significantly lower than SPMO's 28.15% return. Over the past 10 years, JNK has underperformed SPMO with an annualized return of 5.09%, while SPMO has yielded a comparatively higher 20.86% annualized return.
JNK
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.67%
- YTD
- 1.83%
- 6M
- 2.49%
- 1Y
- 7.11%
- 3Y*
- 8.62%
- 5Y*
- 3.65%
- 10Y*
- 5.09%
SPMO
- 1D
- 1.26%
- 1M
- 4.23%
- YTD
- 28.15%
- 6M
- 28.70%
- 1Y
- 43.47%
- 3Y*
- 41.53%
- 5Y*
- 23.50%
- 10Y*
- 20.86%
JNK vs. SPMO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JNK State Street SPDR Bloomberg High Yield Bond ETF | 1.83% | 8.76% | 7.71% | 12.42% | -12.19% | 4.00% | 4.95% | 14.88% | -3.28% | 6.49% |
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 28.15% | 26.58% | 45.82% | 17.56% | -10.45% | 22.64% | 28.25% | 25.93% | -0.92% | 27.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between JNK and SPMO is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2015 | 0.54 |
The correlation between JNK and SPMO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.54 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.
JNK vs. SPMO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
JNK
SPMO
Technology
Energy
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
JNK
SPMO
Energy
JNK
SPMO
Basic Materials
JNK
-
SPMO
Communication Services
JNK
-
SPMO
Consumer Cyclical
JNK
-
SPMO
Consumer Defensive
JNK
-
SPMO
Financial Services
JNK
-
SPMO
Healthcare
JNK
-
SPMO
Industrials
JNK
-
SPMO
Real Estate
JNK
-
SPMO
Utilities
JNK
-
SPMO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JNK vs. SPMO — Risk / Return Rank
JNK
SPMO
JNK vs. SPMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR Bloomberg High Yield Bond ETF (JNK) and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| JNK | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.40 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.41 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.85 | 3.44 | -0.59 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.52 | 13.01 | -0.49 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
JNK vs. SPMO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JNK drawdown since its inception was -38.48%, which is greater than SPMO's maximum drawdown of -30.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JNK and SPMO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JNK | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.48% | -30.95% | -7.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.51% | -12.70% | +10.19% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.02% | -20.13% | +15.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.67% | -22.74% | +6.07% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -22.89% | -30.95% | +8.06% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.68% | +1.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.69% | -4.60% | +0.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.57% | 3.35% | -2.78% |
Volatility
JNK vs. SPMO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for State Street SPDR Bloomberg High Yield Bond ETF (JNK) is 1.21%, while Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) has a volatility of 10.29%. This indicates that JNK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JNK | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.21% | 10.29% | -9.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.03% | 16.73% | -13.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.87% | 19.48% | -15.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.55% | 19.65% | -12.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.31% | 20.48% | -12.17% |
JNK vs. SPMO - Expense Ratio Comparison
JNK has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than SPMO's 0.13% expense ratio.
Dividends
JNK vs. SPMO - Dividend Comparison
JNK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.60%, more than SPMO's 0.67% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JNK State Street SPDR Bloomberg High Yield Bond ETF | 6.60% | 6.54% | 6.63% | 6.38% | 6.06% | 4.27% | 5.11% | 5.44% | 5.90% | 5.60% | 6.06% | 6.59% |
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 0.67% | 0.73% | 0.48% | 1.63% | 1.66% | 0.52% | 1.27% | 1.39% | 1.05% | 0.77% | 1.94% | 0.36% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JNK and SPMO have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPMO has higher volatility (10.29%) compared to JNK (1.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JNK dropped -38.48% vs SPMO's -30.95%.
On 10-year performance, SPMO leads with 20.86% vs 5.09% for JNK. On fees, SPMO is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, JNK has been the lower-risk option at 1.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPMO has performed better with a 20.86% return vs 5.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPMO is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for JNK.
JNK has the higher dividend yield at 6.60%, compared with 0.67% for SPMO.
JNK is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while SPMO is Momentum. JNK tracks Bloomberg High Yield Very Liquid Index, while SPMO tracks S&P 500 Momentum Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for JNK and 0.13% for SPMO.
SPMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs 1.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JNK and SPMO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer