JNK vs. CG
JNK (State Street SPDR Bloomberg High Yield Bond ETF) is High Yield Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg High Yield Very Liquid Index, while CG (The Carlyle Group Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, JNK returned 5.09%/yr vs 16.61%/yr for CG. A 0.50 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
JNK vs. CG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JNK achieves a 1.83% return, which is significantly higher than CG's -21.53% return. Over the past 10 years, JNK has underperformed CG with an annualized return of 5.09%, while CG has yielded a comparatively higher 16.61% annualized return.
JNK
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.67%
- YTD
- 1.83%
- 6M
- 2.49%
- 1Y
- 7.11%
- 3Y*
- 8.62%
- 5Y*
- 3.65%
- 10Y*
- 5.09%
CG
- 1D
- 2.69%
- 1M
- -6.25%
- YTD
- -21.53%
- 6M
- -20.51%
- 1Y
- -1.61%
- 3Y*
- 18.18%
- 5Y*
- 3.96%
- 10Y*
- 16.61%
JNK vs. CG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JNK State Street SPDR Bloomberg High Yield Bond ETF | 1.83% | 8.76% | 7.71% | 12.42% | -12.19% | 4.00% | 4.95% | 14.88% | -3.28% | 6.49% |
CG The Carlyle Group Inc. | -21.53% | 20.20% | 28.05% | 42.55% | -43.78% | 78.46% | 1.62% | 116.75% | -27.28% | 59.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between JNK and CG is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 3, 2012 | 0.50 |
The correlation between JNK and CG shifts across timeframes, from 0.50 (all time) to 0.61 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JNK vs. CG — Risk / Return Rank
JNK
CG
JNK vs. CG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR Bloomberg High Yield Bond ETF (JNK) and The Carlyle Group Inc. (CG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| JNK | CG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.89 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.62 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.02 | +0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.85 | -0.04 | +2.89 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.52 | -0.08 | +12.60 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
JNK vs. CG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JNK drawdown since its inception was -38.48%, smaller than the maximum CG drawdown of -62.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JNK and CG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JNK | CG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.48% | -62.69% | +24.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.51% | -37.83% | +35.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.02% | -38.53% | +33.51% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.67% | -56.75% | +40.08% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -22.89% | -56.75% | +33.86% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -32.67% | +32.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.69% | -21.75% | +18.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.57% | 19.76% | -19.19% |
Volatility
JNK vs. CG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for State Street SPDR Bloomberg High Yield Bond ETF (JNK) is 1.21%, while The Carlyle Group Inc. (CG) has a volatility of 10.06%. This indicates that JNK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JNK | CG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.21% | 10.06% | -8.85% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.03% | 27.69% | -24.66% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.87% | 36.18% | -32.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.55% | 39.78% | -32.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.31% | 37.38% | -29.07% |
Dividends
JNK vs. CG - Dividend Comparison
JNK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.60%, more than CG's 3.06% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CG The Carlyle Group Inc. | 3.06% | 2.37% | 2.77% | 3.38% | 4.11% | 1.82% | 3.18% | 4.24% | 7.87% | 5.41% | 11.02% | 21.70% |
JNK State Street SPDR Bloomberg High Yield Bond ETF | 6.60% | 6.54% | 6.63% | 6.38% | 6.06% | 4.27% | 5.11% | 5.44% | 5.90% | 5.60% | 6.06% | 6.59% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JNK and CG have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CG has higher volatility (10.06%) compared to JNK (1.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JNK dropped -38.48% vs CG's -62.69%.
JNK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.84 vs -0.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JNK and CG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer