PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
CG vs. VOO
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between CG and VOO is 0.56, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.00.6

Performance

CG vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The Carlyle Group Inc. (CG) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-20.00%-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
10.34%
3.64%
CG
VOO

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

CG:

0.92

VOO:

1.87

Sortino Ratio

CG:

1.42

VOO:

2.50

Omega Ratio

CG:

1.18

VOO:

1.35

Calmar Ratio

CG:

1.02

VOO:

2.80

Martin Ratio

CG:

3.21

VOO:

11.95

Ulcer Index

CG:

9.99%

VOO:

1.98%

Daily Std Dev

CG:

34.79%

VOO:

12.73%

Max Drawdown

CG:

-62.70%

VOO:

-33.99%

Current Drawdown

CG:

-7.79%

VOO:

-4.03%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CG achieves a 0.10% return, which is significantly higher than VOO's -0.79% return. Over the past 10 years, CG has outperformed VOO with an annualized return of 13.96%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively lower 13.25% annualized return.


CG

YTD

0.10%

1M

-3.99%

6M

16.45%

1Y

32.51%

5Y*

13.36%

10Y*

13.96%

VOO

YTD

-0.79%

1M

-3.48%

6M

4.23%

1Y

23.66%

5Y*

13.95%

10Y*

13.25%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

CG vs. VOO — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CG
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CG is 7676
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CG is 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CG is 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CG is 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CG is 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CG is 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

VOO
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of VOO is 8181
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of VOO is 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of VOO is 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of VOO is 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of VOO is 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of VOO is 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

CG vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Carlyle Group Inc. (CG) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CG, currently valued at 0.92, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.000.921.87
The chart of Sortino ratio for CG, currently valued at 1.42, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.422.50
The chart of Omega ratio for CG, currently valued at 1.18, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.181.35
The chart of Calmar ratio for CG, currently valued at 1.02, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.022.80
The chart of Martin ratio for CG, currently valued at 3.21, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.003.2111.95
CG
VOO

The current CG Sharpe Ratio is 0.92, which is lower than the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 1.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CG and VOO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.004.00AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
0.92
1.87
CG
VOO

Dividends

CG vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

CG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.77%, more than VOO's 1.25% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
CG
The Carlyle Group Inc.
2.77%2.77%3.38%4.11%1.82%3.18%4.24%7.87%5.41%11.02%21.70%6.84%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.25%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%1.85%

Drawdowns

CG vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CG drawdown since its inception was -62.70%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CG and VOO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-35.00%-30.00%-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-7.79%
-4.03%
CG
VOO

Volatility

CG vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

The Carlyle Group Inc. (CG) has a higher volatility of 10.89% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 4.65%. This indicates that CG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
10.89%
4.65%
CG
VOO
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab