JNJ vs. IWM
JNJ (Johnson & Johnson) is a stock, while IWM (iShares Russell 2000 ETF) is Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 2000 Index. Over the past 10 years, JNJ returned 10.46%/yr vs 11.27%/yr for IWM. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
JNJ vs. IWM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JNJ achieves a 17.68% return, which is significantly lower than IWM's 19.22% return. Over the past 10 years, JNJ has underperformed IWM with an annualized return of 10.46%, while IWM has yielded a comparatively higher 11.27% annualized return.
JNJ
- 1D
- 1.07%
- 1M
- 5.14%
- YTD
- 17.68%
- 6M
- 15.11%
- 1Y
- 57.60%
- 3Y*
- 17.82%
- 5Y*
- 10.94%
- 10Y*
- 10.46%
IWM
- 1D
- 0.87%
- 1M
- 3.64%
- YTD
- 19.22%
- 6M
- 16.00%
- 1Y
- 39.16%
- 3Y*
- 17.23%
- 5Y*
- 6.07%
- 10Y*
- 11.27%
JNJ vs. IWM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JNJ Johnson & Johnson | 17.68% | 47.48% | -4.81% | -8.58% | 5.97% | 11.44% | 10.82% | 16.22% | -5.13% | 24.43% |
IWM iShares Russell 2000 ETF | 19.22% | 12.66% | 11.38% | 16.83% | -20.48% | 14.54% | 20.03% | 25.39% | -11.12% | 14.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between JNJ and IWM is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2000 | 0.33 |
Over the past year, the correlation between JNJ and IWM has dropped to 0.03 - well below their long-term average of 0.33, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JNJ vs. IWM — Risk / Return Rank
JNJ
IWM
JNJ vs. IWM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) and iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| JNJ | IWM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.43 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.61 | 1.33 | +0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.28 | 3.57 | +1.71 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.52 | 12.63 | +2.90 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
JNJ vs. IWM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JNJ drawdown since its inception was -50.67%, smaller than the maximum IWM drawdown of -59.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JNJ and IWM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JNJ | IWM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.67% | -59.05% | +8.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.96% | -11.03% | +0.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.95% | -27.50% | +11.55% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.41% | -31.91% | +13.50% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -27.37% | -41.13% | +13.76% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.54% | 0.00% | -2.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.90% | -10.76% | -1.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.72% | 3.12% | +0.60% |
Volatility
JNJ vs. IWM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) is 5.47%, while iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM) has a volatility of 7.16%. This indicates that JNJ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IWM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JNJ | IWM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.47% | 7.16% | -1.69% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.16% | 14.29% | -2.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.94% | 19.73% | -2.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.87% | 22.61% | -5.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.48% | 23.08% | -4.60% |
Dividends
JNJ vs. IWM - Dividend Comparison
JNJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.18%, more than IWM's 0.87% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWM iShares Russell 2000 ETF | 0.87% | 1.04% | 1.15% | 1.35% | 1.48% | 0.94% | 1.04% | 1.26% | 1.40% | 1.26% | 1.38% | 1.54% |
JNJ Johnson & Johnson | 2.18% | 2.48% | 3.40% | 3.00% | 2.52% | 2.45% | 2.53% | 2.57% | 2.74% | 2.38% | 2.73% | 2.87% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JNJ and IWM have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IWM has higher volatility (7.16%) compared to JNJ (5.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JNJ dropped -50.67% vs IWM's -59.05%.
JNJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.42 vs 1.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JNJ and IWM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer