JNGTX vs. STK
Compare and contrast key facts about Janus Henderson Global Technology and Innovation Fund Class D (JNGTX) and Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Closed Fund (STK).
JNGTX is managed by Janus Henderson. It was launched on Dec 31, 1998. STK is an actively managed fund by Aberdeen. It was launched on Nov 25, 2009.
Performance
JNGTX vs. STK - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
JNGTX vs. STK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JNGTX Janus Henderson Global Technology and Innovation Fund Class D | -7.02% | 25.00% | 32.34% | 55.33% | -37.63% | 17.53% | 51.18% | 45.15% | 0.92% | 44.69% |
STK Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Closed Fund | 7.23% | 24.85% | 17.74% | 46.60% | -30.36% | 48.63% | 25.39% | 52.73% | -14.91% | 33.52% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JNGTX achieves a -7.02% return, which is significantly lower than STK's 7.23% return. Over the past 10 years, JNGTX has outperformed STK with an annualized return of 20.41%, while STK has yielded a comparatively lower 19.36% annualized return.
JNGTX
- 1D
- 4.03%
- 1M
- -7.48%
- YTD
- -7.02%
- 6M
- -6.55%
- 1Y
- 27.77%
- 3Y*
- 24.99%
- 5Y*
- 10.78%
- 10Y*
- 20.41%
STK
- 1D
- 2.79%
- 1M
- -3.99%
- YTD
- 7.23%
- 6M
- 13.94%
- 1Y
- 50.57%
- 3Y*
- 23.77%
- 5Y*
- 15.10%
- 10Y*
- 19.36%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
JNGTX vs. STK - Expense Ratio Comparison
JNGTX has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than STK's 1.26% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
JNGTX vs. STK — Risk / Return Rank
JNGTX
STK
JNGTX vs. STK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson Global Technology and Innovation Fund Class D (JNGTX) and Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Closed Fund (STK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JNGTX | STK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.16 | 1.97 | -0.81 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.73 | 2.70 | -0.97 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.38 | -0.14 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.80 | 3.73 | -1.94 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.10 | 13.76 | -7.66 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JNGTX | STK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.16 | 1.97 | -0.81 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 | 0.61 | -0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.84 | 0.75 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | 0.65 | -0.21 |
Correlation
The correlation between JNGTX and STK is 0.68, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
JNGTX vs. STK - Dividend Comparison
JNGTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.43%, more than STK's 6.96% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JNGTX Janus Henderson Global Technology and Innovation Fund Class D | 14.43% | 13.42% | 11.65% | 0.77% | 0.00% | 15.86% | 8.99% | 8.55% | 6.61% | 7.47% | 4.83% | 7.75% |
STK Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Closed Fund | 6.96% | 7.38% | 16.02% | 6.70% | 12.62% | 8.48% | 6.79% | 7.86% | 14.88% | 11.82% | 9.87% | 10.32% |
Drawdowns
JNGTX vs. STK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JNGTX drawdown since its inception was -84.79%, which is greater than STK's maximum drawdown of -41.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JNGTX and STK.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| JNGTX | STK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -84.79% | -41.74% | -43.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.93% | -13.59% | -2.34% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -46.46% | -36.27% | -10.19% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.46% | -41.74% | -4.72% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.54% | -4.93% | -7.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -40.47% | -7.47% | -33.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.69% | 3.69% | +1.00% |
Volatility
JNGTX vs. STK - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Janus Henderson Global Technology and Innovation Fund Class D (JNGTX) is 8.32%, while Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Closed Fund (STK) has a volatility of 10.03%. This indicates that JNGTX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than STK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| JNGTX | STK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.32% | 10.03% | -1.71% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.27% | 18.08% | -1.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.51% | 25.75% | -0.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.29% | 24.85% | +1.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.40% | 25.92% | -1.52% |