PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JNGIX vs. JGLTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JNGIX vs. JGLTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Janus Henderson Growth And Income Fund (JNGIX) and Janus Henderson VIT Global Technology and Innovation Portfolio (JGLTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JNGIX achieves a 10.17% return, which is significantly lower than JGLTX's 35.13% return. Over the past 10 years, JNGIX has underperformed JGLTX with an annualized return of 13.93%, while JGLTX has yielded a comparatively higher 24.87% annualized return.


JNGIX

1D
0.27%
1M
5.86%
YTD
10.17%
6M
10.47%
1Y
26.61%
3Y*
18.62%
5Y*
12.23%
10Y*
13.93%

JGLTX

1D
0.97%
1M
18.11%
YTD
35.13%
6M
35.19%
1Y
60.36%
3Y*
37.03%
5Y*
19.79%
10Y*
24.87%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JNGIX vs. JGLTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JNGIX
Janus Henderson Growth And Income Fund
10.17%20.07%15.26%18.06%-14.27%28.97%10.35%27.14%-1.96%24.20%
JGLTX
Janus Henderson VIT Global Technology and Innovation Portfolio
35.13%25.19%32.10%54.55%-36.42%18.28%50.42%45.29%1.17%45.17%

Correlation

The correlation between JNGIX and JGLTX is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 19, 2000

0.84

The correlation between JNGIX and JGLTX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JNGIX vs. JGLTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JNGIX
JNGIX Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
JNGIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JNGIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
JNGIX Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
JNGIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
JNGIX Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

JGLTX
JGLTX Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
JGLTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JGLTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
JGLTX Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
JGLTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
JGLTX Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JNGIX vs. JGLTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson Growth And Income Fund (JNGIX) and Janus Henderson VIT Global Technology and Innovation Portfolio (JGLTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JNGIXJGLTXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.84

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.63

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.49

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.72

3.92

-1.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.17

13.43

-1.26

JNGIX vs. JGLTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JNGIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.18, which is comparable to the JGLTX Sharpe Ratio of 3.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JNGIX and JGLTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JNGIXJGLTXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.18

3.02

-0.84

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

0.76

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

1.02

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

0.36

+0.11

Drawdowns

JNGIX vs. JGLTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JNGIX drawdown since its inception was -63.66%, smaller than the maximum JGLTX drawdown of -81.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JNGIX and JGLTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JNGIXJGLTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.66%

-81.78%

+18.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.14%

-15.81%

+5.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.75%

-23.72%

-3.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.75%

-45.18%

+18.43%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.48%

-45.18%

+9.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.42%

-36.60%

+21.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.26%

4.60%

-2.34%

Volatility

JNGIX vs. JGLTX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Janus Henderson Growth And Income Fund (JNGIX) is 3.15%, while Janus Henderson VIT Global Technology and Innovation Portfolio (JGLTX) has a volatility of 6.73%. This indicates that JNGIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JGLTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JNGIXJGLTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.15%

6.73%

-3.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.82%

16.85%

-7.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.63%

20.49%

-7.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.61%

26.10%

-7.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.89%

24.49%

-5.60%

JNGIX vs. JGLTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JNGIX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than JGLTX's 0.72% expense ratio.


Dividends

JNGIX vs. JGLTX - Dividend Comparison

JNGIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.70%, more than JGLTX's 6.64% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JGLTX
Janus Henderson VIT Global Technology and Innovation Portfolio
6.64%8.98%0.00%0.00%26.96%14.48%7.71%6.81%4.95%5.68%3.71%16.11%
JNGIX
Janus Henderson Growth And Income Fund
13.70%14.98%15.34%7.88%6.69%5.59%4.22%3.89%7.99%2.92%7.88%9.59%

Frequently Asked Questions


JNGIX and JGLTX have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JGLTX has higher volatility (6.73%) compared to JNGIX (3.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JNGIX dropped -63.66% vs JGLTX's -81.78%.

JGLTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.02 vs 2.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JNGIX and JGLTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer