JNGIX vs. JGLTX
Compare and contrast key facts about Janus Henderson Growth And Income Fund (JNGIX) and Janus Henderson VIT Global Technology and Innovation Portfolio (JGLTX).
JNGIX is managed by Janus Henderson. It was launched on May 15, 1991. JGLTX is managed by Janus Henderson. It was launched on Jan 17, 2000.
Performance
JNGIX vs. JGLTX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
JNGIX vs. JGLTX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JNGIX Janus Henderson Growth And Income Fund | -7.39% | 20.07% | 15.26% | 18.06% | -14.27% | 28.97% | 10.35% | 27.14% | -1.96% | 24.20% |
JGLTX Janus Henderson VIT Global Technology and Innovation Portfolio | -10.57% | 25.19% | 32.10% | 54.55% | -36.42% | 18.28% | 50.42% | 45.29% | 1.17% | 45.17% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JNGIX achieves a -7.39% return, which is significantly higher than JGLTX's -10.57% return. Over the past 10 years, JNGIX has underperformed JGLTX with an annualized return of 12.08%, while JGLTX has yielded a comparatively higher 20.23% annualized return.
JNGIX
- 1D
- -0.52%
- 1M
- -8.95%
- YTD
- -7.39%
- 6M
- -5.00%
- 1Y
- 16.30%
- 3Y*
- 13.06%
- 5Y*
- 9.45%
- 10Y*
- 12.08%
JGLTX
- 1D
- -1.43%
- 1M
- -10.72%
- YTD
- -10.57%
- 6M
- -9.78%
- 1Y
- 24.46%
- 3Y*
- 23.30%
- 5Y*
- 11.02%
- 10Y*
- 20.23%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
JNGIX vs. JGLTX - Expense Ratio Comparison
JNGIX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than JGLTX's 0.72% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
JNGIX vs. JGLTX — Risk / Return Rank
JNGIX
JGLTX
JNGIX vs. JGLTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson Growth And Income Fund (JNGIX) and Janus Henderson VIT Global Technology and Innovation Portfolio (JGLTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JNGIX | JGLTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.92 | 0.95 | -0.03 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.43 | 1.46 | -0.04 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.20 | +0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.24 | 1.29 | -0.05 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.46 | 4.44 | +1.02 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JNGIX | JGLTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 | 0.95 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 | 0.43 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.64 | 0.84 | -0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 0.29 | +0.15 |
Correlation
The correlation between JNGIX and JGLTX is 0.84, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
JNGIX vs. JGLTX - Dividend Comparison
JNGIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.99%, more than JGLTX's 10.04% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JNGIX Janus Henderson Growth And Income Fund | 15.99% | 14.98% | 15.34% | 7.88% | 6.69% | 5.59% | 4.22% | 3.89% | 7.99% | 2.92% | 7.88% | 9.59% |
JGLTX Janus Henderson VIT Global Technology and Innovation Portfolio | 10.04% | 8.98% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 26.96% | 14.48% | 7.71% | 6.81% | 4.95% | 5.68% | 3.71% | 16.11% |
Drawdowns
JNGIX vs. JGLTX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JNGIX drawdown since its inception was -63.66%, smaller than the maximum JGLTX drawdown of -81.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JNGIX and JGLTX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| JNGIX | JGLTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.66% | -81.78% | +18.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.77% | -15.81% | +4.04% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.75% | -45.18% | +18.43% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.48% | -45.18% | +9.70% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.14% | -15.81% | +5.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.50% | -36.83% | +21.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.68% | 4.58% | -1.90% |
Volatility
JNGIX vs. JGLTX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Janus Henderson Growth And Income Fund (JNGIX) is 4.38%, while Janus Henderson VIT Global Technology and Innovation Portfolio (JGLTX) has a volatility of 6.94%. This indicates that JNGIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JGLTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| JNGIX | JGLTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.38% | 6.94% | -2.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.57% | 15.62% | -6.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.72% | 25.03% | -6.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.55% | 25.89% | -7.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.83% | 24.28% | -5.45% |