PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JNBSX vs. MOAT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JNBSX vs. MOAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Income Builder Fund (JNBSX) and VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JNBSX achieves a 6.11% return, which is significantly higher than MOAT's -0.07% return. Over the past 10 years, JNBSX has underperformed MOAT with an annualized return of 6.21%, while MOAT has yielded a comparatively higher 13.40% annualized return.


JNBSX

1D
-0.36%
1M
1.87%
YTD
6.11%
6M
6.62%
1Y
15.17%
3Y*
11.10%
5Y*
4.53%
10Y*
6.21%

MOAT

1D
0.88%
1M
3.57%
YTD
-0.07%
6M
-0.05%
1Y
15.51%
3Y*
11.79%
5Y*
8.20%
10Y*
13.40%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JNBSX vs. MOAT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JNBSX
JPMorgan Income Builder Fund
6.11%12.87%7.36%9.34%-12.81%9.19%6.24%14.95%-4.22%11.89%
MOAT
VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF
-0.07%13.20%10.73%31.89%-13.66%24.12%14.84%34.79%-1.28%23.18%

Correlation

The correlation between JNBSX and MOAT is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 26, 2012

0.77

The correlation between JNBSX and MOAT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JNBSX vs. MOAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JNBSX
JNBSX Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
JNBSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JNBSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
JNBSX Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
JNBSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
JNBSX Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

MOAT
MOAT Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
MOAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MOAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
MOAT Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
MOAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
MOAT Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JNBSX vs. MOAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Income Builder Fund (JNBSX) and VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JNBSXMOATDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.82

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.19

+0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.74

1.25

+1.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.10

3.90

+9.20

JNBSX vs. MOAT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JNBSX Sharpe Ratio is 2.46, which is higher than the MOAT Sharpe Ratio of 1.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JNBSX and MOAT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JNBSXMOATDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.46

1.12

+1.34

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

0.45

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

0.72

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.61

0.78

-0.16

Drawdowns

JNBSX vs. MOAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JNBSX drawdown since its inception was -37.33%, which is greater than MOAT's maximum drawdown of -33.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JNBSX and MOAT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JNBSXMOATDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.33%

-33.31%

-4.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.72%

-12.43%

+6.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.90%

-21.44%

+13.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.22%

-23.96%

+4.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.60%

-33.31%

+9.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.36%

-3.88%

+3.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.82%

-3.83%

-0.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.20%

3.98%

-2.78%

Volatility

JNBSX vs. MOAT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JPMorgan Income Builder Fund (JNBSX) is 2.07%, while VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT) has a volatility of 3.86%. This indicates that JNBSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MOAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JNBSXMOATDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.07%

3.86%

-1.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.37%

9.88%

-4.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.37%

13.85%

-7.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.81%

18.18%

-10.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.88%

18.68%

-10.80%

JNBSX vs. MOAT - Expense Ratio Comparison

JNBSX has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than MOAT's 0.47% expense ratio.


Dividends

JNBSX vs. MOAT - Dividend Comparison

JNBSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.12%, more than MOAT's 1.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JNBSX
JPMorgan Income Builder Fund
5.12%5.16%5.90%5.07%4.61%8.53%3.47%4.17%4.56%3.89%4.40%4.20%
MOAT
VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF
1.36%1.36%1.37%0.86%1.25%1.08%1.46%1.31%1.79%1.07%1.17%2.13%

Frequently Asked Questions


JNBSX and MOAT have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MOAT has higher volatility (3.86%) compared to JNBSX (2.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JNBSX dropped -37.33% vs MOAT's -33.31%.

JNBSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.46 vs 1.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JNBSX and MOAT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer