PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JNBSX vs. FSIRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JNBSX vs. FSIRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Income Builder Fund (JNBSX) and Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class I (FSIRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JNBSX achieves a 6.11% return, which is significantly lower than FSIRX's 8.63% return. Over the past 10 years, JNBSX has outperformed FSIRX with an annualized return of 6.21%, while FSIRX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.75% annualized return.


JNBSX

1D
-0.36%
1M
1.87%
YTD
6.11%
6M
6.62%
1Y
15.17%
3Y*
11.10%
5Y*
4.53%
10Y*
6.21%

FSIRX

1D
-0.10%
1M
-0.21%
YTD
8.63%
6M
8.87%
1Y
16.32%
3Y*
10.11%
5Y*
6.22%
10Y*
5.75%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JNBSX vs. FSIRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JNBSX
JPMorgan Income Builder Fund
6.11%12.87%7.36%9.34%-12.81%9.19%6.24%14.95%-4.22%11.89%
FSIRX
Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class I
8.63%10.38%5.83%4.58%-3.34%15.89%3.72%10.55%-3.99%4.10%

Correlation

The correlation between JNBSX and FSIRX is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.66

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 1, 2007

0.64

Over the past year, the correlation between JNBSX and FSIRX has dropped to 0.43 - well below their long-term average of 0.64, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JNBSX vs. FSIRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JNBSX
JNBSX Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
JNBSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JNBSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
JNBSX Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
JNBSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
JNBSX Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

FSIRX
FSIRX Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
FSIRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSIRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSIRX Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
FSIRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSIRX Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JNBSX vs. FSIRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Income Builder Fund (JNBSX) and Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class I (FSIRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JNBSXFSIRXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.70

-0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.74

8.11

-5.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.10

31.78

-18.68

JNBSX vs. FSIRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JNBSX Sharpe Ratio is 2.46, which is comparable to the FSIRX Sharpe Ratio of 3.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JNBSX and FSIRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JNBSXFSIRXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.46

3.52

-1.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

0.90

-0.32

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

0.86

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.61

0.61

+0.01

Drawdowns

JNBSX vs. FSIRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JNBSX drawdown since its inception was -37.33%, which is greater than FSIRX's maximum drawdown of -33.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JNBSX and FSIRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JNBSXFSIRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.33%

-33.39%

-3.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.72%

-2.05%

-3.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.90%

-5.81%

-2.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.22%

-12.82%

-6.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.60%

-19.98%

-3.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.36%

-0.83%

+0.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.82%

-4.17%

-0.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.20%

0.52%

+0.68%

Volatility

JNBSX vs. FSIRX - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan Income Builder Fund (JNBSX) has a higher volatility of 2.07% compared to Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class I (FSIRX) at 1.31%. This indicates that JNBSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSIRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JNBSXFSIRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.07%

1.31%

+0.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.37%

3.77%

+1.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.37%

4.74%

+1.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.81%

6.92%

+0.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.88%

6.74%

+1.14%

JNBSX vs. FSIRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JNBSX has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than FSIRX's 0.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

JNBSX vs. FSIRX - Dividend Comparison

JNBSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.12%, more than FSIRX's 4.19% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSIRX
Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class I
4.19%4.72%4.80%5.28%7.33%5.37%2.23%3.09%9.42%2.63%2.37%1.75%
JNBSX
JPMorgan Income Builder Fund
5.12%5.16%5.90%5.07%4.61%8.53%3.47%4.17%4.56%3.89%4.40%4.20%

Frequently Asked Questions


JNBSX and FSIRX have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JNBSX has higher volatility (2.07%) compared to FSIRX (1.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JNBSX dropped -37.33% vs FSIRX's -33.39%.

FSIRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.52 vs 2.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JNBSX and FSIRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer