JNBAX vs. GBMFX
Compare and contrast key facts about JPMorgan Income Builder Fund Class A (JNBAX) and GMO Benchmark-Free Allocation Fund (GBMFX).
JNBAX is a passively managed fund by JPMorgan that tracks the performance of the 60% MSCI World Index (net total return) / 40% Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Index. It was launched on May 31, 2007. GBMFX is managed by GMO. It was launched on Jul 22, 2003.
Performance
JNBAX vs. GBMFX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
JNBAX vs. GBMFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JNBAX JPMorgan Income Builder Fund Class A | -0.28% | 12.74% | 7.22% | 9.20% | -12.97% | 8.82% | 6.09% | 14.81% | -4.46% | 11.85% |
GBMFX GMO Benchmark-Free Allocation Fund | 5.61% | 22.89% | 4.33% | 13.46% | -2.24% | 2.97% | -2.50% | 11.62% | -5.36% | 13.05% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JNBAX achieves a -0.28% return, which is significantly lower than GBMFX's 5.61% return. Over the past 10 years, JNBAX has underperformed GBMFX with an annualized return of 5.64%, while GBMFX has yielded a comparatively higher 6.41% annualized return.
JNBAX
- 1D
- 1.57%
- 1M
- -3.81%
- YTD
- -0.28%
- 6M
- 1.77%
- 1Y
- 11.02%
- 3Y*
- 8.51%
- 5Y*
- 3.90%
- 10Y*
- 5.64%
GBMFX
- 1D
- 1.07%
- 1M
- -3.00%
- YTD
- 5.61%
- 6M
- 11.79%
- 1Y
- 23.90%
- 3Y*
- 14.40%
- 5Y*
- 8.00%
- 10Y*
- 6.41%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
JNBAX vs. GBMFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
JNBAX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than GBMFX's 0.74% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
JNBAX vs. GBMFX — Risk / Return Rank
JNBAX
GBMFX
JNBAX vs. GBMFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Income Builder Fund Class A (JNBAX) and GMO Benchmark-Free Allocation Fund (GBMFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JNBAX | GBMFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.45 | 3.02 | -1.58 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.97 | 4.00 | -2.03 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.61 | -0.30 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.85 | 3.91 | -2.06 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.28 | 15.09 | -6.81 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JNBAX | GBMFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.45 | 3.02 | -1.58 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 | 1.11 | -0.61 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.72 | 0.81 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.56 | 0.96 | -0.40 |
Correlation
The correlation between JNBAX and GBMFX is 0.80, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
JNBAX vs. GBMFX - Dividend Comparison
JNBAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.18%, more than GBMFX's 3.94% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JNBAX JPMorgan Income Builder Fund Class A | 5.18% | 5.04% | 5.77% | 4.94% | 4.46% | 8.18% | 3.34% | 4.03% | 4.41% | 3.74% | 4.27% | 4.06% |
GBMFX GMO Benchmark-Free Allocation Fund | 3.94% | 4.16% | 5.14% | 5.64% | 3.20% | 2.46% | 3.73% | 3.35% | 3.67% | 2.39% | 1.60% | 2.10% |
Drawdowns
JNBAX vs. GBMFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JNBAX drawdown since its inception was -37.41%, which is greater than GBMFX's maximum drawdown of -23.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JNBAX and GBMFX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| JNBAX | GBMFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.41% | -23.40% | -14.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.20% | -5.98% | -0.22% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.26% | -14.42% | -4.84% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -23.56% | -23.40% | -0.16% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.26% | -3.64% | -0.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.92% | -3.29% | -1.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.39% | 1.57% | -0.18% |
Volatility
JNBAX vs. GBMFX - Volatility Comparison
JPMorgan Income Builder Fund Class A (JNBAX) has a higher volatility of 3.66% compared to GMO Benchmark-Free Allocation Fund (GBMFX) at 3.44%. This indicates that JNBAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GBMFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| JNBAX | GBMFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.66% | 3.44% | +0.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.12% | 5.30% | -0.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.90% | 7.97% | -0.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.75% | 7.22% | +0.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.84% | 7.97% | -0.13% |