PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JMUNX vs. NMTRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JMUNX vs. NMTRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Johnson Municipal Income Fund (JMUNX) and Nuveen Municipal Total Return Managed Accounts (NMTRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JMUNX achieves a 1.30% return, which is significantly lower than NMTRX's 2.58% return. Over the past 10 years, JMUNX has underperformed NMTRX with an annualized return of 1.42%, while NMTRX has yielded a comparatively higher 2.22% annualized return.


JMUNX

1D
0.00%
1M
1.86%
YTD
1.30%
6M
1.48%
1Y
6.19%
3Y*
2.84%
5Y*
0.45%
10Y*
1.42%

NMTRX

1D
-0.10%
1M
1.91%
YTD
2.58%
6M
3.08%
1Y
8.06%
3Y*
4.13%
5Y*
0.53%
10Y*
2.22%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JMUNX vs. NMTRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JMUNX
Johnson Municipal Income Fund
1.30%3.71%-0.19%5.75%-8.10%0.30%5.12%5.66%0.90%3.24%
NMTRX
Nuveen Municipal Total Return Managed Accounts
2.58%3.90%1.99%6.21%-11.98%2.69%5.25%9.26%1.06%7.41%

Correlation

The correlation between JMUNX and NMTRX is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.75

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 31, 2007

0.76

The correlation between JMUNX and NMTRX shifts across timeframes, from 0.67 (1 year) to 0.78 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JMUNX vs. NMTRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JMUNX
JMUNX Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
JMUNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JMUNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
JMUNX Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
JMUNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
JMUNX Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

NMTRX
NMTRX Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
NMTRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NMTRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
NMTRX Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
NMTRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
NMTRX Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JMUNX vs. NMTRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Johnson Municipal Income Fund (JMUNX) and Nuveen Municipal Total Return Managed Accounts (NMTRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JMUNXNMTRXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.60

1.69

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.81

3.10

-1.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.07

11.40

-5.33

JMUNX vs. NMTRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JMUNX Sharpe Ratio is 2.40, which is comparable to the NMTRX Sharpe Ratio of 2.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JMUNX and NMTRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JMUNX vs. NMTRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JMUNX drawdown since its inception was -13.08%, smaller than the maximum NMTRX drawdown of -16.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JMUNX and NMTRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JMUNXNMTRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.08%

-16.36%

+3.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.51%

-2.65%

-0.86%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.20%

-5.77%

-1.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.08%

-16.36%

+3.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-13.08%

-16.36%

+3.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.79%

-0.10%

-0.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.65%

-2.90%

+0.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.04%

0.72%

+0.32%

Volatility

JMUNX vs. NMTRX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Johnson Municipal Income Fund (JMUNX) is 0.62%, while Nuveen Municipal Total Return Managed Accounts (NMTRX) has a volatility of 0.90%. This indicates that JMUNX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NMTRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JMUNXNMTRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.62%

0.90%

-0.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.11%

2.24%

-0.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.65%

2.98%

-0.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.13%

4.03%

+0.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.97%

4.40%

-0.43%

JMUNX vs. NMTRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JMUNX has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than NMTRX's 0.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

JMUNX vs. NMTRX - Dividend Comparison

JMUNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.61%, less than NMTRX's 4.58% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JMUNX
Johnson Municipal Income Fund
2.61%3.49%2.41%2.79%2.30%1.96%1.93%2.00%1.88%1.86%1.83%2.09%
NMTRX
Nuveen Municipal Total Return Managed Accounts
4.58%4.46%3.55%3.67%3.28%2.73%2.92%3.20%3.47%3.28%3.71%3.91%

Frequently Asked Questions


JMUNX and NMTRX have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NMTRX has higher volatility (0.90%) compared to JMUNX (0.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JMUNX dropped -13.08% vs NMTRX's -16.36%.

NMTRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.76 vs 2.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JMUNX and NMTRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer