JMUNX vs. JIBFX
Compare and contrast key facts about Johnson Municipal Income Fund (JMUNX) and Johnson Institutional Core Bond Fund (JIBFX).
JMUNX is managed by Johnson Mutual Funds. It was launched on May 15, 1994. JIBFX is managed by Johnson Mutual Funds. It was launched on Aug 31, 2000.
Performance
JMUNX vs. JIBFX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
JMUNX vs. JIBFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JMUNX Johnson Municipal Income Fund | -1.05% | 3.71% | -0.19% | 5.75% | -8.10% | 0.30% | 5.12% | 5.66% | 0.90% | 3.24% |
JIBFX Johnson Institutional Core Bond Fund | -0.34% | 7.87% | 1.21% | 5.43% | -13.69% | -2.04% | 9.71% | 8.95% | 0.10% | 3.73% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JMUNX achieves a -1.05% return, which is significantly lower than JIBFX's -0.34% return. Over the past 10 years, JMUNX has underperformed JIBFX with an annualized return of 1.32%, while JIBFX has yielded a comparatively higher 1.90% annualized return.
JMUNX
- 1D
- 0.31%
- 1M
- -2.85%
- YTD
- -1.05%
- 6M
- 0.36%
- 1Y
- 3.02%
- 3Y*
- 1.89%
- 5Y*
- 0.21%
- 10Y*
- 1.32%
JIBFX
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- -1.82%
- YTD
- -0.34%
- 6M
- 0.49%
- 1Y
- 3.95%
- 3Y*
- 3.53%
- 5Y*
- 0.11%
- 10Y*
- 1.90%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
JMUNX vs. JIBFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
JMUNX has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than JIBFX's 0.25% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
JMUNX vs. JIBFX — Risk / Return Rank
JMUNX
JIBFX
JMUNX vs. JIBFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Johnson Municipal Income Fund (JMUNX) and Johnson Institutional Core Bond Fund (JIBFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JMUNX | JIBFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.55 | 0.91 | -0.36 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.75 | 1.30 | -0.55 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.16 | +0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.67 | 1.47 | -0.80 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.31 | 4.37 | -2.06 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JMUNX | JIBFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.55 | 0.91 | -0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.05 | 0.02 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.34 | 0.36 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.36 | 0.24 | +0.12 |
Correlation
The correlation between JMUNX and JIBFX is 0.53, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
JMUNX vs. JIBFX - Dividend Comparison
JMUNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.67%, less than JIBFX's 3.54% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JMUNX Johnson Municipal Income Fund | 2.67% | 3.49% | 2.41% | 2.79% | 2.30% | 1.96% | 1.93% | 2.00% | 1.88% | 1.86% | 1.83% | 2.09% |
JIBFX Johnson Institutional Core Bond Fund | 3.54% | 3.85% | 3.69% | 2.92% | 2.41% | 1.75% | 3.11% | 2.76% | 2.77% | 2.52% | 3.03% | 2.60% |
Drawdowns
JMUNX vs. JIBFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JMUNX drawdown since its inception was -13.08%, smaller than the maximum JIBFX drawdown of -19.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JMUNX and JIBFX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| JMUNX | JIBFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.08% | -19.54% | +6.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.44% | -3.02% | -2.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.08% | -18.96% | +5.88% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -13.08% | -19.54% | +6.46% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.08% | -3.40% | +0.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.66% | -5.18% | +2.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.58% | 1.02% | +0.56% |
Volatility
JMUNX vs. JIBFX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Johnson Municipal Income Fund (JMUNX) is 1.40%, while Johnson Institutional Core Bond Fund (JIBFX) has a volatility of 1.68%. This indicates that JMUNX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JIBFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| JMUNX | JIBFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.40% | 1.68% | -0.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.84% | 2.76% | -0.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.12% | 4.68% | +1.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.09% | 6.53% | -2.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.95% | 5.31% | -1.36% |