PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JMUB vs. BBUS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JMUB vs. BBUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Municipal ETF (JMUB) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JMUB achieves a 0.28% return, which is significantly lower than BBUS's 9.70% return.


JMUB

1D
-0.11%
1M
-1.60%
6M
-0.39%
YTD
0.28%
1Y
4.03%
3Y*
3.28%
5Y*
0.80%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
2.86%

BBUS

1D
0.73%
1M
0.21%
6M
8.38%
YTD
9.70%
1Y
20.80%
3Y*
19.31%
5Y*
12.29%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
15.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$26.56M$23.62M$29.53M
$53.39M$63.40M$50.76M

JMUB vs. BBUS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
JMUB
JPMorgan Municipal ETF
0.28%4.34%1.88%5.96%-7.43%1.58%4.98%6.09%
BBUS
JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF
9.70%17.77%24.89%27.20%-19.46%27.13%20.69%16.26%

Correlation

The correlation between JMUB and BBUS is 0.26, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.20

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 13, 2019

0.10

The correlation between JMUB and BBUS shifts across timeframes, from 0.10 (all time) to 0.26 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JMUB vs. BBUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

JMUB
JMUB Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
JMUB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JMUB Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
JMUB Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
JMUB Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
JMUB Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

BBUS
BBUS Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
BBUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBUS Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
BBUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBUS Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

JMUB vs. BBUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Municipal ETF (JMUB) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JMUBBBUSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.26

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.79

2.05

-0.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.81

8.63

-2.82

JMUB vs. BBUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JMUB Sharpe Ratio is 1.83, which is comparable to the BBUS Sharpe Ratio of 1.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JMUB and BBUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JMUB vs. BBUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JMUB drawdown since its inception was -12.50%, smaller than the maximum BBUS drawdown of -35.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JMUB and BBUS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JMUBBBUSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.50%

-35.35%

+22.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.55%

-9.21%

+6.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.02%

-19.01%

+14.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.06%

-25.46%

+13.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.64%

-1.55%

-0.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.47%

-5.38%

+2.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.78%

2.19%

-1.41%

Volatility

JMUB vs. BBUS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JPMorgan Municipal ETF (JMUB) is 0.88%, while JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS) has a volatility of 3.54%. This indicates that JMUB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BBUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JMUBBBUSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.88%

3.54%

-2.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.05%

10.14%

-8.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.50%

12.89%

-10.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.35%

17.15%

-13.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.12%

19.50%

-15.38%

JMUB vs. BBUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

JMUB has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than BBUS's 0.02% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

JMUB vs. BBUS - Dividend Comparison

JMUB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.65%, more than BBUS's 1.01% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
BBUS
JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF
1.01%1.07%1.21%1.38%1.57%1.11%1.43%1.37%0.00%
JMUB
JPMorgan Municipal ETF
3.36%3.52%3.50%3.20%2.16%1.94%2.13%3.66%0.45%

Frequently Asked Questions


JMUB and BBUS have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BBUS has higher volatility (3.54%) compared to JMUB (0.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JMUB dropped -12.50% vs BBUS's -35.35%.

On 5-year performance, BBUS leads with 12.29% vs 0.80% for JMUB. On fees, BBUS is cheaper at 0.02% per year. On volatility, JMUB has been the lower-risk option at 0.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, BBUS has performed better with a 12.29% return vs 0.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BBUS is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for JMUB.

JMUB has the higher dividend yield at 3.36%, compared with 1.01% for BBUS.

JMUB is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while BBUS is Large Cap Blend Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for JMUB and 0.02% for BBUS.

JMUB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.83 vs 1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JMUB and BBUS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer