PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JMTG vs. JMBS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JMTG vs. JMBS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF (JMTG) and Janus Henderson Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF (JMBS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JMTG achieves a 0.40% return, which is significantly higher than JMBS's 0.13% return.


JMTG

1D
-0.34%
1M
-0.41%
6M
0.12%
YTD
0.40%
1Y
5.00%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

JMBS

1D
-0.34%
1M
-0.89%
6M
-0.44%
YTD
0.13%
1Y
5.35%
3Y*
4.52%
5Y*
0.63%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JMTG vs. JMBS - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between JMTG and JMBS is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2025

0.90

The correlation between JMTG and JMBS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JMTG vs. JMBS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JMTG
JMTG Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
JMTG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JMTG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
JMTG Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
JMTG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
JMTG Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

JMBS
JMBS Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
JMBS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JMBS Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
JMBS Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
JMBS Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
JMBS Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JMTG vs. JMBS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF (JMTG) and Janus Henderson Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF (JMBS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JMTGJMBSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.23

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.81

1.76

+0.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.98

5.31

-0.32

JMTG vs. JMBS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JMTG Sharpe Ratio is 1.36, which is comparable to the JMBS Sharpe Ratio of 1.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JMTG and JMBS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JMTG vs. JMBS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JMTG drawdown since its inception was -2.78%, smaller than the maximum JMBS drawdown of -16.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JMTG and JMBS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JMTGJMBSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.78%

-16.68%

+13.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.78%

-3.05%

+0.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.85%

-2.02%

+0.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.75%

-3.86%

+3.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.01%

1.01%

0.00%

Volatility

JMTG vs. JMBS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JPMorgan Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF (JMTG) is 1.22%, while Janus Henderson Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF (JMBS) has a volatility of 1.43%. This indicates that JMTG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JMBS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JMTGJMBSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.22%

1.43%

-0.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.89%

3.44%

-0.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.70%

4.28%

-0.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.70%

6.53%

-2.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.70%

5.51%

-1.81%

JMTG vs. JMBS - Expense Ratio Comparison

JMTG has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is lower than JMBS's 0.32% expense ratio.


Dividends

JMTG vs. JMBS - Dividend Comparison

JMTG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.32%, less than JMBS's 5.23% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
JMBS
Janus Henderson Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF
5.23%5.03%5.53%4.38%2.73%1.16%2.92%3.63%0.89%
JMTG
JPMorgan Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF
4.32%2.10%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, JMTG and JMBS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

JMBS has higher volatility (1.43%) compared to JMTG (1.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JMTG dropped -2.78% vs JMBS's -16.68%.

On 1-year performance, JMBS leads with 5.35% vs 5.00% for JMTG. On fees, JMTG is cheaper at 0.24% per year. On volatility, JMTG has been the lower-risk option at 1.22%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, JMBS has performed better with a 5.35% return vs 5.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

JMTG is cheaper with a 0.24% expense ratio, compared with 0.32% for JMBS.

JMBS has the higher dividend yield at 5.23%, compared with 4.32% for JMTG.

They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Janus Henderson. Their fees differ too: 0.24% for JMTG and 0.32% for JMBS.

JMTG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.36 vs 1.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JMTG and JMBS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer