JMST vs. XOP
JMST (JPMorgan Ultra-Short Municipal Income ETF) and XOP (SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - JMST is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by JPMorgan, while XOP is a Energy Equities fund tracking the S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Select Industry. JMST is actively managed, while XOP is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, JMST returned 2.30%/yr vs 19.29%/yr for XOP. Their -0.03 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. JMST charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XOP.
Performance
JMST vs. XOP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JMST achieves a 1.22% return, which is significantly lower than XOP's 41.76% return.
JMST
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- -0.04%
- 6M
- 0.84%
- YTD
- 1.22%
- 1Y
- 2.45%
- 3Y*
- 3.28%
- 5Y*
- 2.30%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 2.13%
XOP
- 1D
- 1.45%
- 1M
- 14.72%
- 6M
- 27.63%
- YTD
- 41.76%
- 1Y
- 46.74%
- 3Y*
- 10.13%
- 5Y*
- 19.29%
- 10Y*
- 5.00%
- ALL TIME*
- 2.68%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $51.89M | $60.71M | $58.68M | |
| $553.31M | $544.38M | $598.08M |
JMST vs. XOP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JMST JPMorgan Ultra-Short Municipal Income ETF | 1.22% | 3.35% | 3.31% | 3.56% | 0.07% | 0.31% | 2.00% | 2.09% | 0.70% |
XOP SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF | 41.76% | -2.15% | -1.00% | 3.56% | 45.37% | 66.74% | -36.40% | -9.44% | -35.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between JMST and XOP is -0.17, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.17 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | -0.08 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | -0.04 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 18, 2018 | -0.03 |
The correlation between JMST and XOP shifts across timeframes, from -0.17 (1 year) to -0.03 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JMST vs. XOP — Risk / Return Rank
JMST
XOP
JMST vs. XOP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Ultra-Short Municipal Income ETF (JMST) and SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF (XOP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| JMST | XOP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.53 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +4.42 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 2.06 | 1.24 | +0.81 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 9.82 | 2.26 | +7.56 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 50.25 | 5.48 | +44.78 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
JMST vs. XOP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JMST drawdown since its inception was -2.41%, smaller than the maximum XOP drawdown of -90.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JMST and XOP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JMST | XOP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.41% | -90.27% | +87.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.25% | -18.50% | +18.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.71% | -34.98% | +34.27% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -1.15% | -34.98% | +33.83% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -82.61% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.04% | -33.74% | +33.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.12% | -42.56% | +42.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.05% | 7.67% | -7.62% |
Volatility
JMST vs. XOP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for JPMorgan Ultra-Short Municipal Income ETF (JMST) is 0.21%, while SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF (XOP) has a volatility of 8.28%. This indicates that JMST experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XOP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JMST | XOP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.21% | 8.28% | -8.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.44% | 22.52% | -22.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.63% | 28.49% | -27.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.83% | 33.53% | -32.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.13% | 40.15% | -39.02% |
JMST vs. XOP - Expense Ratio Comparison
JMST has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than XOP's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
JMST vs. XOP - Dividend Comparison
JMST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.62%, more than XOP's 1.83% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JMST JPMorgan Ultra-Short Municipal Income ETF | 2.40% | 2.84% | 3.32% | 3.09% | 1.10% | 0.27% | 0.87% | 1.63% | 0.28% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XOP SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF | 1.83% | 2.62% | 2.45% | 2.63% | 2.47% | 1.61% | 2.34% | 1.47% | 0.99% | 0.76% | 0.76% | 2.21% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JMST and XOP have a correlation of -0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XOP has higher volatility (8.28%) compared to JMST (0.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JMST dropped -2.41% vs XOP's -90.27%.
On 5-year performance, XOP leads with 19.29% vs 2.30% for JMST. On fees, JMST is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, JMST has been the lower-risk option at 0.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, XOP has performed better with a 19.29% return vs 2.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
JMST is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XOP.
JMST has the higher dividend yield at 2.40%, compared with 1.83% for XOP.
JMST is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while XOP is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for JMST and 0.35% for XOP.
JMST currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.00 vs 1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JMST and XOP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer