PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JMSIX vs. FFNAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JMSIX vs. FFNAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Income Fund (JMSIX) and Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 40% Fund Class A (FFNAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JMSIX achieves a 1.35% return, which is significantly lower than FFNAX's 7.44% return. Over the past 10 years, JMSIX has underperformed FFNAX with an annualized return of 3.98%, while FFNAX has yielded a comparatively higher 6.57% annualized return.


JMSIX

1D
0.12%
1M
0.39%
YTD
1.35%
6M
1.85%
1Y
5.92%
3Y*
7.12%
5Y*
2.81%
10Y*
3.98%

FFNAX

1D
0.33%
1M
2.72%
YTD
7.44%
6M
7.96%
1Y
17.36%
3Y*
11.11%
5Y*
5.23%
10Y*
6.57%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JMSIX vs. FFNAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JMSIX
JPMorgan Income Fund
1.35%7.68%7.78%6.14%-8.24%3.59%3.07%11.82%1.03%6.00%
FFNAX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 40% Fund Class A
7.44%12.83%7.02%11.27%-13.89%7.72%12.74%15.56%-4.46%10.98%

Correlation

The correlation between JMSIX and FFNAX is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.39

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.45

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2014

0.43

The correlation between JMSIX and FFNAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.39 (1 year) to 0.51 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JMSIX vs. FFNAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JMSIX
JMSIX Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
JMSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JMSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
JMSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
JMSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
JMSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

FFNAX
FFNAX Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
FFNAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFNAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFNAX Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
FFNAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFNAX Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JMSIX vs. FFNAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Income Fund (JMSIX) and Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 40% Fund Class A (FFNAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JMSIXFFNAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.74

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.60

1.51

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.59

3.37

+0.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.87

14.54

+0.34

JMSIX vs. FFNAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JMSIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.30, which is comparable to the FFNAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JMSIX and FFNAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JMSIXFFNAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.30

2.64

-0.34

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

0.67

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.03

0.86

+0.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.79

0.64

+0.15

Drawdowns

JMSIX vs. FFNAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JMSIX drawdown since its inception was -18.40%, smaller than the maximum FFNAX drawdown of -31.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JMSIX and FFNAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JMSIXFFNAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.40%

-31.88%

+13.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.62%

-5.20%

+3.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.31%

-7.60%

+5.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.39%

-18.77%

+7.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.40%

-18.77%

+0.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.57%

-3.94%

+1.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.39%

1.20%

-0.81%

Volatility

JMSIX vs. FFNAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JPMorgan Income Fund (JMSIX) is 0.82%, while Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 40% Fund Class A (FFNAX) has a volatility of 2.30%. This indicates that JMSIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FFNAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JMSIXFFNAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.82%

2.30%

-1.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.88%

5.47%

-3.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.53%

6.65%

-4.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.73%

7.86%

-4.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.87%

7.69%

-3.82%

JMSIX vs. FFNAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JMSIX has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than FFNAX's 0.83% expense ratio.


Dividends

JMSIX vs. FFNAX - Dividend Comparison

JMSIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.02%, more than FFNAX's 3.38% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FFNAX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 40% Fund Class A
3.38%3.69%2.54%2.20%5.40%2.06%2.08%3.37%4.21%2.32%1.21%2.88%
JMSIX
JPMorgan Income Fund
6.02%5.95%5.78%4.43%4.78%4.00%4.95%5.10%5.43%5.42%0.46%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


JMSIX and FFNAX have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FFNAX has higher volatility (2.30%) compared to JMSIX (0.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JMSIX dropped -18.40% vs FFNAX's -31.88%.

FFNAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.64 vs 2.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JMSIX and FFNAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer