JMMF vs. GNR

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

JMMF (JPMorgan 100% U.S. Treasury Securities Money Market ETF) and GNR (SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - JMMF is a Money Market fund actively managed by JPMorgan, while GNR is a Commodity Producers Equities fund tracking the S&P Global Natural Resources Index. JMMF is actively managed, while GNR is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.16, they often move in opposite directions. JMMF charges 0.16%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for GNR.

Performance

JMMF vs. GNR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan 100% U.S. Treasury Securities Money Market ETF (JMMF) and SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF (GNR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JMMF achieves a 1.42% return, which is significantly lower than GNR's 20.27% return.

JMMF

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 0.29%
• YTD: 1.42%
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GNR

• 1D: -0.53%
• 1M: 1.20%
• YTD: 20.27%
• 6M: 23.12%
• 1Y: 43.10%
• 3Y*: 15.55%
• 5Y*: 9.73%
• 10Y*: 10.91%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JMMF vs. GNR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
JMMF JPMorgan 100% U.S. Treasury Securities Money Market ETF	1.42%	0.17%
GNR SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF	20.27%	0.80%

Correlation

The correlation between JMMF and GNR is -0.16, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 12, 2025	-0.16

Return for Risk

JMMF vs. GNR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GNR

GNR Risk / Return Rank: 82
GNR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
GNR Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
GNR Omega Ratio Rank: 76
GNR Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
GNR Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JMMF vs. GNR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan 100% U.S. Treasury Securities Money Market ETF (JMMF) and SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF (GNR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	JMMF	GNR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.64	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.48	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.50	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	6.42	0.26	+6.16

Drawdowns

JMMF vs. GNR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JMMF drawdown since its inception was -0.14%, smaller than the maximum GNR drawdown of -51.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JMMF and GNR.

Drawdown Indicators

	JMMF	GNR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-0.14%	-51.37%	+51.23%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-7.97%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-21.15%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-25.66%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-48.59%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-1.51%	+1.51%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.01%	-14.95%	+14.94%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.03%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	JMMF	GNR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	4.53%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	13.23%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.54%	16.39%	-15.85%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	0.54%	20.23%	-19.69%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	0.54%	21.88%	-21.34%

JMMF vs. GNR - Expense Ratio Comparison

JMMF has a 0.16% expense ratio, which is lower than GNR's 0.40% expense ratio.

Dividends

JMMF vs. GNR - Dividend Comparison

JMMF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.59%, less than GNR's 2.47% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GNR SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF	2.47%	2.76%	4.73%	3.37%	4.37%	3.44%	2.78%	3.84%	3.51%	2.40%	2.06%	4.59%
JMMF JPMorgan 100% U.S. Treasury Securities Money Market ETF	1.59%	0.20%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JMMF and GNR in my portfolio?

JMMF and GNR have a correlation of -0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, JMMF or GNR?

On fees, JMMF is cheaper at 0.16% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, JMMF or GNR?

JMMF is cheaper with a 0.16% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for GNR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, JMMF or GNR?

GNR has the higher dividend yield at 2.47%, compared with 1.59% for JMMF.

What is the main difference between JMMF and GNR?

JMMF is categorized as Money Market, while GNR is Commodity Producers Equities. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.16% for JMMF and 0.40% for GNR.