JMMF vs. ECML
JMMF (JPMorgan 100% U.S. Treasury Securities Money Market ETF) and ECML (EA Series Trust - Euclidean Fundamental Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - JMMF is a Money Market fund actively managed by JPMorgan, while ECML is a Small Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Euclidean. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.15, they often move in opposite directions. JMMF charges 0.16%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for ECML.
Performance
JMMF vs. ECML - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JMMF achieves a 1.64% return, which is significantly lower than ECML's 14.97% return.
JMMF
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 0.28%
- YTD
- 1.64%
- 6M
- 1.67%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ECML
- 1D
- 0.52%
- 1M
- 1.31%
- YTD
- 14.97%
- 6M
- 13.33%
- 1Y
- 26.69%
- 3Y*
- 14.48%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JMMF vs. ECML - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
JMMF JPMorgan 100% U.S. Treasury Securities Money Market ETF | 1.64% | 0.17% |
ECML EA Series Trust - Euclidean Fundamental Value ETF | 14.97% | -1.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between JMMF and ECML is -0.15, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2025 | -0.15 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JMMF vs. ECML — Risk / Return Rank
JMMF
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
ECML
JMMF vs. ECML - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan 100% U.S. Treasury Securities Money Market ETF (JMMF) and EA Series Trust - Euclidean Fundamental Value ETF (ECML). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| JMMF | ECML | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.31 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.83 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 10.90 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
JMMF vs. ECML - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JMMF drawdown since its inception was -0.14%, smaller than the maximum ECML drawdown of -24.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JMMF and ECML.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JMMF | ECML | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.14% | -24.66% | +24.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -7.01% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -24.66% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.95% | +1.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.01% | -5.79% | +5.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.46% | — |
Volatility
JMMF vs. ECML - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JMMF | ECML | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.03% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 9.70% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.51% | 14.75% | -14.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.51% | 18.32% | -17.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.51% | 18.32% | -17.81% |
JMMF vs. ECML - Expense Ratio Comparison
JMMF has a 0.16% expense ratio, which is lower than ECML's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
JMMF vs. ECML - Dividend Comparison
JMMF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.80%, more than ECML's 1.20% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ECML EA Series Trust - Euclidean Fundamental Value ETF | 1.20% | 1.38% | 0.98% | 0.77% |
JMMF JPMorgan 100% U.S. Treasury Securities Money Market ETF | 1.80% | 0.20% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JMMF and ECML have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, JMMF is cheaper at 0.16% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
JMMF is cheaper with a 0.16% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for ECML.
JMMF has the higher dividend yield at 1.80%, compared with 1.20% for ECML.
JMMF is categorized as Money Market, while ECML is Small Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Euclidean. Their fees differ too: 0.16% for JMMF and 0.95% for ECML.
Find the right allocation for JMMF and ECML
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer